|
[Sponsors] |
[ANSYS Meshing] Problem with O-grid in drill pipe |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 10, 2011, 09:55 |
Problem with O-grid in drill pipe
|
#1 |
New Member
Bahadir
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi guys,
I'm new in the forum and leraning CFD recently for my graduation project, so any advice would be very much appreciated. I created a drill pipe for the fluid path to be stimulated by using O-grid. However when I have a look at angles of grids from quality controls they are not so good. May be I am doing wrong with O grid ? Do some one help me? |
|
April 11, 2011, 21:26 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,663
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 47 |
Your question doesn't have enough info for me to help you.
And remember, a pictures is worth a thousand words...
__________________
----------------------------------------- Please help guide development at ANSYS by filling in these surveys Public ANSYS ICEM CFD Users Survey This second one is more general (Gambit, TGrid and ANSYS Meshing users welcome)... CFD Online Users Survey |
|
April 12, 2011, 08:13 |
Pipe
|
#3 |
New Member
Bahadir
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 15 |
Helo Simon.
First of all thank you for trying to help me. My aim to make better the angle distribution in the quality control the range og my angles is 45-88 degrees. Here I attached my pichture i Hope it will help you Pipe.jpg |
|
April 12, 2011, 09:51 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,663
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 47 |
Your angles look fine. Most solvers are happy if you can get it above 9 or 18 degrees. What is your worst angle? What is your worst aspect ratio?
However, you distributions could use some work. Your radial edges need more nodes and they should be bunched toward the walls to better capture the boundary profile. Alternatively, you could rescale your ogrid (rather than add more nodes). But you would still want to bunch toward the wall (growth rate of 1.2 or 1.5 away from the wall is common) Ideally you would have a smooth transition across your model. You could try running the Orthogonal hexahedral smoother if you wanted.
__________________
----------------------------------------- Please help guide development at ANSYS by filling in these surveys Public ANSYS ICEM CFD Users Survey This second one is more general (Gambit, TGrid and ANSYS Meshing users welcome)... CFD Online Users Survey |
|
April 13, 2011, 06:48 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Bahadir
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 15 |
First of all thank you very much for helping
My smallest angle is 45 deg. so based on your reply it seems that OK. I will try to change as you said , hope will work. |
|
April 13, 2011, 09:43 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
AB
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: France
Posts: 323
Rep Power: 22 |
For your information, with the solver I'm using, if the smallest angle is superior to 18, it's good.
So with 45, you are more than good |
|
May 4, 2011, 15:51 |
|
#7 |
New Member
|
hello
another way to improve the quality and appearance of the mesh is to reduce the size of Ogrid. Blocking> Edit Block> Modify Ogrid in Modify Ogrid> Method = Rescale Ogrid + Edge (is the radial O-grid selected edge) + Offset = 0.7 |
|
May 5, 2011, 06:00 |
|
#8 |
New Member
Bahadir
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 15 |
Thanks German I will try
|
|
May 6, 2011, 12:51 |
|
#9 |
New Member
|
I recommend upload geometry files, blocks to try to help more.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problem with BC on non-overlapping grid interface | Ori Levin | FLUENT | 1 | August 29, 2006 19:32 |
Problem meshing very thin pipe | B. Hemmen | FLUENT | 2 | May 16, 2006 09:29 |
Unstructured grid problem - Laminar flow pipe | Roby | FLUENT | 0 | January 12, 2006 06:54 |
Grid Independent Solution | Chuck Leakeas | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 26, 2000 12:18 |
nonstaggered grid problem | Zhi-Xing Yu | Main CFD Forum | 7 | August 26, 1998 14:22 |