|
[Sponsors] |
January 17, 2011, 13:51 |
Meshing by bottom up approach
|
#1 |
Senior Member
---------
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 303
Rep Power: 18 |
I have a heater coil geometry to mesh in ICEM , the attached image shows the geometry. i'd like to consider a bottom up approach for blocking the geometry to generate a Hex mesh. Can some one please suggest me if it is fine to proceed this way?
Another question: I've tried to coarsen a mesh in ICEM by the Adjust mesh density option but that didn't work out what can be the reason for this ?
__________________
Best regards, Santhosh. |
|
January 17, 2011, 14:36 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,663
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 47 |
Yes, bottom up would probably be best/easiest. You could try the automatic surface blocking with a fill... (aka MultiZone, which you could also try in ANSYS Meshing (workbench)) or you could start with just a 2D block of one end and extrude it along the curve...
As for adjust mesh density not working, you have not given enough info to guess anything but user error at this point. What did you try and what was the result? |
|
January 18, 2011, 14:09 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
---------
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 303
Rep Power: 18 |
oh sorry regarding the coarsening of mesh i didn't know about the option coarsen surface mesh elements , later when i turned it on everything went well.
Any way I found this option of coarsening the mesh to be very useful in my case but it's for the first time that I used it so I wonder if it is a commonly used and a recommended option in ICEM and again as I try to smoothen the resultant coarse mesh i see that the number of elements in the mesh goes on decreasing further as the smoothing progresses, what can be the reason for this ? I have the option allow node merging turned on while smoothing.
__________________
Best regards, Santhosh. Last edited by saisanthoshm88; January 18, 2011 at 14:46. |
|
January 18, 2011, 17:28 |
Coarsening...
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,663
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 47 |
Yes, the mesh coarsening works pretty well because ICEM CFD is aware of your edges and other sharp features... So when it coarsens, you don't actually lose these important details. Also, the limiting factor is the quality, so you know your final mesh will be good.
Some users like using a very fine mesh to make sure all CFD details are captured and then they coarsen to get the cell count down. Other FEA users may start with a durability model (say 150,000 elements) and then coarsen it to get the 15K NVH model in one operation and without losing the features... |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Best Meshing scheme for Cylinder | Nutrex | Main CFD Forum | 4 | July 29, 2008 12:03 |
Meshing locks workbench window. | andy2o | CFX | 0 | February 1, 2008 06:01 |
What is thsuitable meshing method for bottom face? | Cartonne | FLUENT | 0 | January 29, 2007 12:33 |
Singularity of grid?Volume meshing vs face meshing | Ken | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 4, 2003 12:09 |
Volume Meshing & Face Meshing? singularity of grid | ken | FLUENT | 0 | September 4, 2003 12:08 |