|
[Sponsors] |
July 29, 2010, 00:18 |
Problem with Remeshing element
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi All,
In my model the interface between two parts is important. So I did run the tet mesh for all model and then Remesh the interface with All tri option to make it better. but when I apply prism mesh for the model, ICEM didn't show any element on the part with remeshing element. I don't know why??? Any suggestion Thanks |
|
July 29, 2010, 10:27 |
Guesses
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,663
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 47 |
When you remeshed the surface, what part were the new tri elements in? The prism growth is based on the element part name, not the underlying surface part name. You need to make sure the triangles are in the correct part. There are commands under edit mesh to take this part name from the underlying surfaces.
When you remeshed the surface, did you leave the tetra mesh there? In other words, is the tetra mesh still connected (conformal) node for node with the surface mesh? You will probably need to delete and regenerate the tetra mesh from the new surface mesh, or at least use the repair option to "Make Consistent" so the existing volume mesh can be made consistent with the new surface mesh. Not sure what else it could be... If these first guesses are not right, you will need to provide more info... Maybe a pic. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Gmsh] gmshToFoam unhandled element | flowris | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 4 | February 20, 2023 18:50 |
mesh file for flow over a circular cylinder | Ardalan | Main CFD Forum | 7 | December 15, 2020 14:06 |
Velocity profiles problem behind the elbow (3D problem) | kabat73 | FLUENT | 8 | May 9, 2010 05:26 |
Dynamic Grid Remeshing causing Divergence? | Andrew Wick | FLUENT | 0 | January 23, 2006 19:39 |
element with negative volume - FSI analysis | Seb | CFX | 3 | May 22, 2005 20:04 |