|
[Sponsors] |
Patch Independent Method, Problematic Geometry |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
July 15, 2010, 05:49 |
Patch Independent Method, Problematic Geometry
|
#1 |
New Member
Okan Isik
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Istanbul-Turkey
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi,
I am new in cfd, and this forum. I am using Ansys Fluent 12.01 I have a centrifugal pump impeller's fluid zone, I want to mesh it with using "patch independent method". But the "Named Selections" cause "problematic geometry" and it is always occurs on "named selections". if the "named selections" are deleted, there are no errors observed. When I delete "Named selections" I cant create required boundarys. How can I handle it? If "Patch Indepentdent method" is wrong selection, which method is better for me? My Fluid Zone is like that: Okan |
|
July 19, 2010, 10:21 |
Refine the mesh to properly capture the Named Selection Boundaries
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,663
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 47 |
I remembered something about this, so I sent Ben Klinkhammer the link. He wrote back that...
Named selections force the PI mesh method to respect all the boundaries of the named selections. If there is not a named selection on a face, the PI mesh method will generally capture the faces, but could skip some of the edge boundaries. Putting a smaller size on the named selection faces will generally do the trick as then the mesher has an easier time capturing the boundaries. Reducing the sizes globally can also do the trick. Unlike Patch Independent, Patch conforming mesh method meshes the edges first, then the faces, then the volume (PI meshes the volumes, then cuts out the faces, edges, etc.). So Patch conforming will generally not have the problem of capturing the edges, but you may get lower quality mesh as a result. (so you may still need to refine as necessary) Generally when you run into this type of problem it is a result of a local mesh size being too large to get a good quality mesh that also captures the boundaries. Hope this helps, Ben |
|
July 20, 2010, 11:57 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Okan Isik
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Istanbul-Turkey
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Thanks for your answer. I am followed the information you given me. It is working but the skewness is a little higher.
Thanks very much... Okan |
|
Tags |
ansys 12, patch independent, problematic geometry |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problematic geometry reported | smillerhh | FLUENT | 1 | December 7, 2006 12:42 |
[Gmsh] Import gmsh msh to Foam | adorean | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 24 | April 27, 2005 09:19 |
comments on FDM, FEM, FVM, SM, SEM, DSEM, BEM | kenn | Main CFD Forum | 2 | July 18, 2004 19:28 |
Adaptive optimization of geometry | Jan Rusås | CFX | 1 | September 16, 2000 03:38 |
Virtual/Real geometry. | Jack Keays | FLUENT | 9 | June 16, 2000 00:39 |