|
[Sponsors] |
May 3, 2010, 10:12 |
Meshing doubt
|
#1 |
New Member
Arjit Arora
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi guys!
Can I get accurate results of CFD of a 3D wing (finite) if I dont use a boundary layer, but instead, a very fine unstructured mesh near the boundary.. growing towards the exterior? Thanks! |
|
May 3, 2010, 10:17 |
contd..
|
#2 |
New Member
Arjit Arora
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 16 |
One of the tutorials that I found online was this:
[http://hmf.enseeiht.fr/travaux/CD010...nual/index.htm Do you think I can get accurate results with such a setup? |
|
May 3, 2010, 12:22 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Ming
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 17 |
depends your turbulence model.
|
|
May 3, 2010, 19:33 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Chris
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 169
Rep Power: 17 |
If you use an unstructured mesh, you'll need more gridpoints to resolve the boundary layer than you would need if you used structured. This is because hexes can tolerate more stretching than tets. Just out of curiosity, why do you want to use unstructured instead of structured?
|
|
May 4, 2010, 05:22 |
Re:
|
#5 |
New Member
Arjit Arora
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 16 |
Thanks for the reply Chris!
I had initially gone in for a structured BL with a structured mesh. However, for the geometry that I am currently meshing, structured meshing doesn't seem to be appropriate, I have to use unstructured mesh. Is a structured BL compatible with an unstructured mesh? If so, how? Thanks again! |
|
June 8, 2010, 21:15 |
Tetra Prism.
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,663
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 47 |
If your geometry is complicated and you would rather go with tetras than hexas, that is fine, but you should insert inflation layers (prism layers) to capture the viscous boundary layer. You could do it with just tetras, but you would need so many that it wouldn't be practical. prisms allow you to have the higher number of elements perpendicular to the wall, and growing in a way that efficiently captures the velocity profile, but without increasing the node count isotropically...
A tetra prism mesh is considered standard these days and is a fully unstructured mesh. |
|
June 9, 2010, 12:16 |
|
#7 | |
New Member
Ming
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
And maybe you mean you want to use hybrid mesh. You can use Hexa-8 in BL, that likes structured mesh. Its efficient is more than 2 times than Penta-6( Prism). And Tetra-4 in far field. |
||
Tags |
3d wing, boundary layer, structured, unstructured |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Doubt regarding 3-D meshing of a rocket nose | nakul | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 0 | April 3, 2010 16:54 |
doubt in meshing: physics | jai | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 9, 2009 08:17 |
doubt on meshing | joe | FLUENT | 2 | September 12, 2005 14:17 |
doubt on meshing a cylinder | FELIX JOE S | FLUENT | 13 | July 27, 2005 09:06 |
ProAm meshing...Doubt | Antony | Siemens | 5 | July 26, 2004 06:31 |