CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[GAMBIT] Connecting volumes

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 7, 2010, 16:31
Default Connecting volumes
  #1
Member
 
ANIL
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 17
makaero is on a distinguished road
Hi

In a mesh of wing geometry, i have a problem with connecting volumes. I assigned the faces between volumes as 'interface' BC in gambit and exported the mesh.

After mesh file read into fluent a note appeared as
Note: Separating interface zone 3 into zones 3 and 1.
interface -> interface (3) and interface:001 (1)

and when asked for grid check in fluent it shows up a warning

"WARNING: Unassigned interface zone detected for interface 1
WARNING: Unassigned interface zone detected for interface 3"

I coudnt figure out whats wrong with the interface faces.
I meshed the all volumes (has 3 small volumes on wing and 3 volumes in domain, as shown in figure) seperately, should i unite or merge the volumes after meshing?

Do i loose the volume mesh if i unite all volumes?

All help appreciated!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2.jpg (97.2 KB, 43 views)
File Type: jpg 3.JPG (48.3 KB, 33 views)
File Type: jpg 1.jpg (97.2 KB, 34 views)
makaero is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 12, 2010, 02:03
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
*if you unite the volumes, you will loose the volume mesh.
*if you set surfaces as Interfaces, your volumes have to be disconnected. Then after you imported your mesh into fluent, you have to define the couple of interfaces (define/interfaces). That's why you get warnings regarding unassigned interfaces
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 12, 2010, 14:26
Default @max
  #3
Member
 
ANIL
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 17
makaero is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the reply.

The problem is resolved now.

As you can see in the grid file, the root and tip of the wing are attached to the faces to minimize the 3d effects, how does it effect Cl and Cd values?
makaero is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 13, 2010, 01:32
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Chris
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 169
Rep Power: 17
Chris D is on a distinguished road
If you're trying to minimize 3D effects, why not just solve a 2D problem? I'm just curious. Also, you might have some problems converging your solution due to the large changes in cell volume in the cross stream direction.
Chris D is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2010, 20:18
Default
  #5
Member
 
ANIL
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 17
makaero is on a distinguished road
Wing leading edge is sinusoidal wave, so icant do a 2d geometry.
yes i do have problem with solution convergence at high AOA.

A mesh with 1.2 million cells working well up to 12deg AoA, but i need the Cl and Cd values at 16 and 18deg of AoA.

How to avoid the convergence problem? i have given a try by under relaxing factors, but it dint fix the problem.

Thanks!
makaero is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[gambit] problem connecting faces on 2 volumes joe_star ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 1 December 16, 2009 03:38
merging faces on a copied volumes kunal FLUENT 0 March 20, 2008 07:50
negative grid volumes when adapting Dave FLUENT 1 August 20, 2005 14:47
Connecting of two volumes Kim FLUENT 3 September 21, 2004 01:59
union of volumes CHUBBY FLUENT 2 May 4, 2001 07:31


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:29.