|
[Sponsors] |
March 24, 2010, 08:44 |
semi-circle meshing
|
#1 |
New Member
Rúben Ramalhais
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Portugal
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello everybody
I need to mesh a semi-circle in GAMBIT 2.2.30 using only quad elements and mapped (can´t use PAVE because my UDF doesn´t work well with it). Can anybody help my with the disposition of the vertex and edges to make it work? I know that I have to use 4 edged faces but using a square inside the circle isn`t helpful, at least by now. Thaks for your help Rúben Ramalhais (ruben_ramalhais@hotmail.com) |
|
March 25, 2010, 03:06 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
why it is not helpful?
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
March 25, 2010, 06:24 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Rúben Ramalhais
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Portugal
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello,
Because I can mesh the square (face), but in the other faces GAMBIT complains about the number of elements, I´ve tried to alter the number of the edges elementes but still can´t mesh the other faces... Ramalhais |
|
March 25, 2010, 07:47 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
are the other faces mappable? (Gambit chooses automatically Map schema?)
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
March 25, 2010, 08:17 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Rúben Ramalhais
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Portugal
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 16 |
No, the GAMBIT automatic options are elements:Quad; Type:tri primitive. But if I try to mesh with this option, an error mensage apear:
ERROR:number of intervals on meshed edges of face, does not allow mesching using de scheme of tri primitive. If I use Type: map, GAMBIT mesh the face but with element quality value of 0.5, wich isn´t good because when I run FLUENT an error occurs due to mesh problems. |
|
March 25, 2010, 09:05 |
|
#6 | |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
Quote:
Mesh Quality (skewness) of 0.5 is good. I don't think the problem comes from that Sans titre.png
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
||
March 25, 2010, 09:30 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Rúben Ramalhais
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Portugal
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 16 |
Is incredible but my UDF works with perfectly regular elements (I´ve tried it with just a square) but when I use it with some distort elements allways occur an error in FLUENT such as AMG solver. I´ve tried it whithout my UDF and FLUENT runs well so it lead me to think that is not a mesh problem, is actually the interaction between my UDF and the mesh...
I´m going to use this mesh and see what happens! Best regards, and thanks for you help Ramalhais |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[blockMesh] I thought about this solution to create a spherical mesh. | sega | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 9 | May 24, 2008 07:15 |
meshing circle | pace | Main CFD Forum | 2 | February 20, 2008 05:26 |
Meshing locks workbench window. | andy2o | CFX | 0 | February 1, 2008 06:01 |
Singularity of grid?Volume meshing vs face meshing | Ken | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 4, 2003 12:09 |
Volume Meshing & Face Meshing? singularity of grid | ken | FLUENT | 0 | September 4, 2003 12:08 |