|
[Sponsors] |
January 19, 2017, 13:30 |
|
#21 |
New Member
parham
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 11 |
Thank you Max for your help. I was able to mesh my geometry. Just for curiosity, Is there any way to mesh Face 2 by Quad map instead of Quad pave?, because it can significantly improve my calculation downstream pipe (volume 2). I was only able to mesh Face 1 with Quad map (since it is annulus face).
|
|
January 20, 2017, 02:33 |
|
#22 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
yes with o-grid
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
January 20, 2017, 13:30 |
|
#23 |
New Member
parham
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 11 |
Dear Max,
I tried to use O-ring method based on another Thread that you suggested, here is the procedure which, unfortunately, failed: First, I created a cube inside a circle, I chose four vertexes on the circle's edges, connect corner of cube to four vertexes on circle. I separated circle edges into four edges.now, I have five faces, including cube. Idid the same on the other face wich has a larger diameter at contraction point. When I reapet the procedure, as you suggested before, to create a surface inside upstream volume by edges, an error occurred. I attached to you geometry. What should I do in this case. |
|
January 23, 2017, 02:24 |
|
#24 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
alright I understand you cannot create the surfaces parallel to the cylinder axis, right?
Did you split the cylinder surface (smallest diameter of the annulus volume)?
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider Last edited by -mAx-; January 23, 2017 at 08:48. |
|
January 23, 2017, 08:42 |
|
#25 |
New Member
parham
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 11 |
Exactly, I cannot create surface from edges parallel to the pipe axis. I also splited small circle into four arc edges. Now in the small circle, I have 5 faces, including one cube.
|
|
January 23, 2017, 08:54 |
|
#26 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
As I mentionned, you need to split the cylinder surface with circle's vertices
Capture.JPG
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
January 23, 2017, 09:49 |
|
#27 |
New Member
parham
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 11 |
As I told you, I have separated the circle from vertexes. Still not working.
|
|
January 23, 2017, 09:52 |
|
#28 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
how did you create the lines parallel to the axis?
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
January 23, 2017, 11:09 |
|
#29 |
New Member
parham
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 11 |
I created two cubes inside circles. I connected vertexes on first and second circles. Also, each vertex on cube to similar one in the second cube. I simply used create edges from vertexes. But, the problem is that when I want to create surface from edges.
|
|
January 23, 2017, 11:49 |
|
#30 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
If you "simple" create Lines like that; then you will not be able to Split the Volume. That s Why I suggested to Split the surface with vertex
Sent from my iPhone using CFD Online Forum mobile app
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
January 25, 2017, 17:30 |
|
#31 |
New Member
parham
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 11 |
Here is the procedure that I did:
As you told, I created four vertexes on circle, then, I have splited face (circle) from four vertexes. So, the result would be a cube inside circle. Eventually, I have 5 faces, see pic 1. I did the same for the second circle (see pic 2). I have linked each vertex on the first circle to the similar one on the second circle (see pic 3). I tried to create face from edges, but still unsuccessful (see pic 4). Something else that I should know? |
|
January 26, 2017, 02:28 |
|
#32 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
No,
your splits are wrong. What you proposed at #23 was good. You only didn't get my point regarding the splits on the cylinder surface. For that I post a picture: I split the blue surface with both vertices (red) Capture1.JPG Capture.JPG
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
January 26, 2017, 17:54 |
|
#33 |
New Member
parham
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 11 |
Excuse me Max, but I do not think you get my problem. I understand that I should split the blue surface from red vertexes in your shared photo. My problem is not to separate two volumes. The big problem is :
When I created four vertexes on small circles in both sides (circles 1 and 2), then created edges 1,2,3,4. I created surfaces from edge 1, edge 3, edge 5, and edge 9. I created also surface from edges 3, 4, edge 6, and 10 and so on (see picture 1). I separated volume from created surfaces to create two volumes. So, the step you suggested is not needed. Question: How can I make a Quad map in picture 3? |
|
January 27, 2017, 01:56 |
|
#34 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
you cannot because this surface is not meshable with map.
You didn't split it as it should be. The 4 corners of your square don't have to lie on the circle. I previously mentionned you that this split was not correct. See your post #23, where you displayed your previous split (and it was good)
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
|
|