|
[Sponsors] |
May 18, 2009, 11:35 |
Gambit: Volume Meshing
|
#1 |
Member
DT
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Lisbon
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Everyone,
I was trying to mesh the flow volume around a small marine vehicle which I'm working on. I followed the steps in the "GAMBIT: Sailboat Tutorial". But when I try to go ahead with tetrahedral volume meshing, it gives me the following error: "Initialization failed, perturb boundary nodes and try again. ERROR: TG_Mesh_Domain failed with error code 1 ERROR: Tetrahedral meshing has failed for volume volume.1 This is usually cause by problems in the face meshes Check the skewness of the face meshes and check that the face mesh sizes are not too large in the areas of small gaps." Can anyone please tell me that how do I go about correcting this? Thank you. |
|
May 18, 2009, 12:55 |
|
#2 |
Member
Ralf Schmidt
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Austria
Posts: 67
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi!
the answer is given in the error message: "Check the skewness of the face meshes and check that the face mesh sizes are not too large in the areas of small gaps." You can check the skewness using the examine mesh button (right lower corner, looks like a mesh and a magnification glass). Select 3D elements and select all possible elements. Then go to "range" and gambit will show you all mesh elements, coloured by there skewness. Blue is low skewness (= high quality) and red is high skewness (low quality). Now, limit the range of the displayed elements to the one with the worst quality (above 0.7 or 0.8) In the region(s) with the worst elements, you have to refine your mesh... Best wishes Ralf
__________________
CFD - nothing but Colourful Fluid Dynamics |
|
May 20, 2009, 04:23 |
|
#3 |
Member
DT
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Lisbon
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 17 |
Dear Ralf,
Thank a lot. I tried refining the mesh but must be going in the wrong direction as far as that is concerned, because the one inverted cell refuses to go away. Please have a look at this picture. It shows where the skewed cells are. Here, surface 1 meets surface 2 almost perpendicularly. Surface 1 is a sweep surface and surface 2 is a cylindrical surface. What should I do to refine the mesh at this junction? http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo...eat=directlink Thanks a lot for the reply. |
|
May 20, 2009, 06:09 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
the problem seems to be on the radius which lies on the surface 2 (tangent)
It produces very small angle (skewness 's source)
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
May 20, 2009, 06:21 |
|
#5 |
Member
Ralf Schmidt
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Austria
Posts: 67
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi!
it is always hard to join two meshes together. the sweep mesh option is inflexible, so the mesh on your source face will be the same as the mesh on the end face. So the attached face must fit to the mesh that is generated with the sweep mesh option.... High quality meshing of(more or less) complex geometries is a major task in CFD. It is not so easy to answer all question to this topic in this form... Ralf
__________________
CFD - nothing but Colourful Fluid Dynamics |
|
Tags |
failed meshing, gambit, volume meshing |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[blockMesh] BlockMesh FOAM warning | gaottino | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 7 | July 19, 2010 15:11 |
On the damBreak4phaseFine cases | paean | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | November 14, 2008 22:14 |
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file | SSL | FLUENT | 2 | January 26, 2008 12:55 |
[blockMesh] Axisymmetrical mesh | Rasmus Gjesing (Gjesing) | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 10 | April 2, 2007 15:00 |