|
[Sponsors] |
October 21, 2015, 13:03 |
|
#21 |
New Member
parham
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 11 |
Hello everyone,
I would appreciate if you help me. I am trying to mesh two surfaces, one is a core (smaller circle) and one is bigger circle. However, I want to mesh both faces separately, that is, when I want to mesh the bigger face, the smaller circle is also meshed. I am trying to split both faces but it does not work. How can I mesh both smaller circle area and the area between smaller circle and bigger circle (annulus) separately? I attached you the photo for you. |
|
October 21, 2015, 13:28 |
|
#22 |
Senior Member
Rick
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,016
Rep Power: 27 |
You need to split big circle with small circle. then you should also split the annular region with other 4 edges to make it fully mappable.
__________________
Google is your friend and the same for the search button! |
|
October 21, 2015, 17:21 |
Re
|
#23 | |
New Member
|
Quote:
You need after created both surfaces, in boolean operations substract the small circle of the larger circle with the retain check list on (red square). Good Luckˇˇ |
||
October 22, 2015, 03:47 |
|
#24 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
How did you create the small core: is it a circle (edge) or a circle (surface)?
Just to use the good words, (and as Daniele mentionned), you need to split the big disk (surface) with the small circle (edge). It will delete the big surface, and create the annular surface and also the core as surfaces. So if you already had a core as surface, you will have 2 core surfaces (you will have to delete the one which isn't connected) The procedure from alejandro is also good if you previously have the 2 surfaces (big and small disk)
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
October 23, 2015, 13:49 |
Face split in Gambit
|
#25 |
New Member
parham
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 11 |
Thank you for your response. I will explain you my case. The Idea is to use multiphase flow model using ,lets say fluid 1 and fluid 2. I want to have fluid one comes to the smaller cylinder while fluid 2 inject from annular (the distance between small and bigger cylinder). Since I could not to separate faces, I tried to define another cylinder as injector for fluid 1 and annular as fluid 2.
Here is the procedure that I have done: • I created a cylinder with height of 500mm and radius 50mm in positive x direction. • I created a cylinder with height of 300mm and radius 30mm in negative x direction. • But I could not split input flow phase face (fluid 1) from its respective volume, also the same for annular for fluid 2. I do not know what the problem is? I have Another question : when I export my straight pipe as .mesh file from Gambit to Ansys fluent, instead of inflow and outflow faces, interior face is created in boundary condition of setup solution. I guess this is due to again attachment of faces to their volume? right? again I attached the photo. |
|
October 26, 2015, 02:05 |
|
#26 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
first question:
how many volume do you have in gambit? Ďf you will use multiphase, you need at least 2 volumes: one for the first cylinder and the rest. Regarding your last question: did you set the boundary conditions?
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
October 29, 2015, 10:21 |
Meshing face and volumes in two cylinders.
|
#27 |
New Member
parham
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 11 |
Thank you Max for your concern. Actually I solved the problem. Regarding to your explanation about two volume, should I mesh two volume separately?or I can use one mesh for both volumes? both cylinders have different diameters. If I have to mesh volumes what about the faces?
|
|
October 29, 2015, 10:23 |
|
#28 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
you will have to mesh them separately, because you will define 2 different fluid domains for your multiphasis.
You will then inialize thre vof variable differently on both fluid domains
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
October 30, 2015, 09:47 |
Quality of mesh
|
#29 |
New Member
parham
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 11 |
I meshed two cylinders separately as you mentioned. Total number of 53856 meshes are obtained with the following quality:
Minimum Orthogonal Quality = 7.84460e-01 Maximum Ortho Skew = 2.15540e-01 Maximum Aspect Ratio = 9.38615e+00 The problem is that I do not have any sense in these parameters? Are they good? |
|
October 30, 2015, 09:59 |
|
#30 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Gam....htm#gc_exmesh
select range select all you type of element (tetra / wedge /hexa) set lower with 0.9 (if you have tetra element) or 0.8 if full hexa check how many cells do you have between lower and upper limit If 0 element, then your mesh should be ok On the other hand, you may import your mesh in fluent, and then check mesh
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
3D Hybrid Mesh Errors | DarrenC | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 11 | August 5, 2013 07:42 |
[snappyHexMesh] external flow with snappyHexMesh | chelvistero | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | January 15, 2010 20:43 |
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file | SSL | FLUENT | 2 | January 26, 2008 12:55 |
mesh problem for cylinder | akr | FLUENT | 1 | January 30, 2007 00:43 |
Mesh Resolution in Gambit | Vidya Raja | FLUENT | 2 | January 19, 2006 00:35 |