|
[Sponsors] |
[ANSYS Meshing] YPlus for simple pipe flow simulation in CFX |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 7, 2020, 10:06 |
YPlus for simple pipe flow simulation in CFX
|
#1 |
New Member
Richard
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello Guys,
I try to simulate a simple pipe flow with SST in CFX. My problem is: I want to achieve YPlus around 1, but until now I can't achieve any value below 10, even if I lower the first layer hight about an magnitude. I calculated the first layer with 9e-06 m and lowered it down to 1e-07 m (tryed higher values too). At this point my solution stops to converge at about 1e-04 (conv. criteria at 1e-06) and the YPlus value stays at 10-12. I also tryed structured and unstructured meshing with element size of 1 mm. My tube has a diameter of 0.02 m and a length of 2 m at an Inlet velocity of 2 m/s. I use water at 20 °C. Sand grain roughness is 0.175 mm. I get this values only if I use the Ansys Post YPlus value. When I calculate it by my self (as expression) with: For n I used both Wall Distance and my specified first prism layer hight (0.000009 m). With this I get values about 0.5 to 1. Is this a well known problem and I am dumb don't knowing it or has anyone an idea what's the problem in this case? Thanks for your help. Last edited by Rischa; September 8, 2020 at 06:03. Reason: Forgot something |
|
Tags |
pipe flow, prism layer meshing, tube flow, y +, y plus |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pressure drop in pipe flow with Large Eddy Simulation | xerox | FLUENT | 1 | October 16, 2019 09:55 |
Simulation of flow through a Pump as turbine by Ansys CFX | Aladinos05 | CFX | 6 | June 13, 2017 22:34 |
Pipe flow simulation problem with pisoFoam: not getting parabolic profile | sahmed | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | September 7, 2016 15:00 |
Pipe Flow Simulation | comingdaytime | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | July 27, 2016 11:40 |
CFX Coronary Flow Simulation | ld1305 | CFX | 13 | February 7, 2012 04:17 |