|
[Sponsors] |
[ANSYS Meshing] Not able to rectify this meshing problem ? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 8, 2018, 09:50 |
Not able to rectify this meshing problem ?
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: india
Posts: 96
Rep Power: 9 |
The size of the entire geometry is about 2.7 m dia but the inlet tubes are of 5.5 mm dia only i and not able to mesh it properly .
Even though orthogonal 0.85 skewness 0.24 are coming. Due to the odd surface of the tubes shown below the temp developed are causing problems. I want it to be meshed without any deformation in surface without compromising the no of elements much. kindly help me out with this |
|
June 11, 2018, 03:47 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Stuart
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 739
Rep Power: 26 |
The mesh is too coarse on those tubes. Use a finer mesh size locally. Also do you need to model near wall gradients? Thus, requiring inflation layers.
|
|
June 12, 2018, 01:39 |
|
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: india
Posts: 96
Rep Power: 9 |
Thanks a lot for that reply, it really helped me a lot.
Now i have refined it to such an extend that the inlet tubes looks ok more structured but i need to confirm with an expert if its really ok. I have attached the figures with the , Kindly have a look at it. orthogonal quality is 0.82 skewness 0.294 which i think is ok for such a complicated diagram.......what do u think sir? I have attached the meshing techs which i have used with this reply too. Kindly help me out............ thanks i advance for the reply |
|
June 12, 2018, 09:20 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Stuart
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 739
Rep Power: 26 |
If fluid is flowing along those tubes then there are not many elements to capture the physics. But you have not said anything about the simulation in order to determine an appropriate mesh. If you can run a preliminary simulation and see what your results are, then you can determine if the mesh is suitable or not and you can make the required changes.
|
|
June 12, 2018, 09:32 |
|
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: india
Posts: 96
Rep Power: 9 |
Quote:
Those are fuel inlet tubes, fuel is sprayed with constant velocity to the furnace through them. I dnt have to capture any velocity change along the tube that's why i meshed it like that , but i have a problem with the simulation result. In the velocity profile obtained using this mesh fig.11 on the left side (attached) i am not getting a prominent flame front velocity as the actual simulated velocity profile as shown in fig 10 (attached) figure on the right side. Is this due to meshing oR physics problem ? Kindly help me out sir, THANKS A LOT IN ADVANCE |
||
Tags |
face meshing, fluent meshing, meshing advice, meshing and geometry |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problem with querying the meshing database in CFX-Pre | ashtonJ | CFX | 18 | April 19, 2023 00:49 |
[Other] Hex meshing problem DM12 | patrick | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 7 | January 9, 2015 08:21 |
Gambit meshing problem to following geometry | ahmadmln | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 2 | October 21, 2014 02:49 |
[ANSYS Meshing] Inflation - Airfoil Meshing - Divergence problem | dalecooper | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 0 | July 19, 2013 08:04 |
Meshing problem in GAMBIT | Vidya Raja | FLUENT | 0 | May 21, 2006 00:31 |