|
[Sponsors] |
[DesignModeler] How to substract the whole body if the body is partial overlap with the tool body |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
July 31, 2017, 11:30 |
How to substract the whole body if the body is partial overlap with the tool body
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 9 |
Hello, everyone,
I have faced an annoy request during automation of parameter model in design modeler. Please refer to the attached Picture, I'm seeking for a automatic method for substract the whole body if the body is already partial or fully contained by the toolbody. Such as the red point target bodies in the attached picture, they are partial contained by the toolbody, they should be substract complete once the operation is finished. The default boolean substract only delete the overlap region. ===================== The above problem has been solved by using nizhantiw's method. Now another new problem comes out for better meshing. For some of the location, after the subtract, there will be a very narrow space, which will result in a very urgly. Any suggestions for this? From my point, if we can automatic cut a hole at below red point, it's OK. However as I'm using parameter study in workbench, I would like to put the generation of modeler, mesh, solution automaticly for different design points (with different diameter). So the fix for these narrow space should be parameter able. Last edited by funkvps; August 2, 2017 at 03:00. |
|
July 31, 2017, 12:23 |
|
#2 |
New Member
NISHANT
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 10 |
I think first you have to create the tool body with add material method then Boolean it. It will work guaranteed.
Sent from my Tab2A7-20F using CFD Online Forum mobile app |
|
August 1, 2017, 06:00 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 9 |
Quote:
|
||
August 1, 2017, 06:02 |
|
#4 |
New Member
NISHANT
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 10 |
||
August 1, 2017, 06:03 |
|
#5 |
New Member
NISHANT
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 10 |
||
August 2, 2017, 02:53 |
|
#6 | |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 9 |
Quote:
|
||
August 2, 2017, 02:58 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 9 |
Now new problems comes out.
For some of the location, after the subtract, there will be a very narrow space, which will result in a very urgly. Any suggestions for this? From my point, if we can automatic cut a hole at below red point, it's OK. However as I'm using parameter study in workbench, I would like to put the generation of modeler, mesh, solution automaticly for different design points (with different diameter). So the fix for these narrow space should be parameter able. |
|
August 2, 2017, 05:28 |
|
#8 |
New Member
NISHANT
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 10 |
Yes, you are absolutely right, btw it is not gonna disturb the solutions
If I can increase the dia of the cut out hole it will serve the purpose or u can increase the dia of the holes embedded on the plate. Sent from my Tab2A7-20F using CFD Online Forum mobile app |
|
August 2, 2017, 05:34 |
|
#9 |
New Member
NISHANT
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 10 |
||
August 2, 2017, 05:48 |
|
#10 | |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 9 |
Quote:
Shell side flow path analysis of shell & tube exchanger with different kinds of baffles |
||
August 2, 2017, 05:49 |
|
#11 | |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 9 |
Quote:
|
||
August 2, 2017, 05:51 |
|
#12 |
New Member
NISHANT
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 10 |
But the current posted image geometry is absolutely fine
Sent from my Tab2A7-20F using CFD Online Forum mobile app |
|
August 2, 2017, 05:52 |
|
#13 |
New Member
NISHANT
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 10 |
Otherwise go to the sketching and make the Line tangent to the circular hole
Sent from my Tab2A7-20F using CFD Online Forum mobile app |
|
August 2, 2017, 05:53 |
|
#14 | |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 9 |
Quote:
|
||
August 2, 2017, 06:01 |
|
#15 |
New Member
NISHANT
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 10 |
||
August 3, 2017, 01:01 |
|
#16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 584
Rep Power: 14 |
just give edge sizing lower than global sizing and make sure behavoir is "HARD"
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Looking for simple CFD tool for bluff body simulations | Jaydeep_Koradiya | Main CFD Forum | 1 | May 24, 2017 14:23 |
How to make appear edge/line body (created in design modeler) in the meshing tool | Rockda | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 6 | June 9, 2016 00:10 |
[ANSYS Meshing] substract and preserve tool body!!! | fazelriahi | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 4 | November 13, 2015 14:28 |
Low Reynolds K Epsilon Launder Sharma Model Functions Doubt... | Ruonin | Main CFD Forum | 17 | February 17, 2014 10:52 |