|
[Sponsors] |
June 20, 2017, 15:31 |
Challenging Meshing Task
|
#1 |
New Member
Benjamin Goddon
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 9 |
Dear all,
I am using ANSYS Fluent Release 17.1 to simulate a compressor wind back seal. I have extracted the cavity in the seal filled with oil and try to mesh it in Fluent. Here below you can see an extract of the model (volume shown is filled with oil). https://www.dropbox.com/sh/gks819w6p...TBaIlp-ia?dl=0 The seal diameter is 80mm. The total thickness is about 0.3mm and the area with the groove is only 0.1mm (highlighted green). As the inner diameter of the seal is rotating, I would need about 10 layers in radial direction for a reasonable CFD simulation. So far I could not find a way to achieve that. Does anybody have any ideas or suggestions how to achieve that? Many thanks in advance for your support Ben Last edited by BenG; June 20, 2017 at 19:01. |
|
June 21, 2017, 09:05 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 292
Rep Power: 14 |
Why is it not achieveable? Is the amount of resulting cells to high?
|
|
June 21, 2017, 18:48 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Benjamin Goddon
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 9 |
Quote:
Thanks for your reply. The problem is that the min. element size where I would get good results is around 0.01mm. This would give me theoretically 10 elements radially at the narrow clearance of 0.1mm, but the total number of elements explodes to an almost infinite number. So far, I only achieved 3 elements radially and ended up with a number of elements around 20mio. Any finer mesh results in my PC not being able to build the mesh even after several hours. Ideally, I would like to use a hexahedral mesh similar to the example shown here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0j915gwpq4A This mesh reduces the number of elements a lot, but should still provide good results. However, due to the fact that the model has this helical groove, I did not manage to achieve a hexahedral mesh and had to use a tetrahedral mesh instead. At present, I have only one potential solution to achieve a reasonable mesh, which I did not yet try and this is to cut the model in two parts: helical and thin walled pipe. The individual components could most probably be meshed much simpler and I guess there is a command to combine the two meshes afterward. This solution, however, seems to me a rather difficult one and I don't know if it works. Do you have any ideas/suggestions? Thanks and regards Ben |
||
June 24, 2017, 07:05 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Benjamin Goddon
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 9 |
Does nobody have any ideas how to get a decent mesh on this wind back seal? I would really appreciate your support :-)
|
|
June 24, 2017, 10:14 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Ali dashti
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9 |
||
Tags |
meshing 3d, rotating cavity, thin oil layer meshing |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[ANSYS Meshing] only automatic meshing works, | kazra | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 2 | February 23, 2017 12:38 |
[Gmsh] 3D coil mesh: can't create the volume? | RomainBou | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 3 | July 18, 2016 06:09 |
Meshing Process | sidharth9426 | STAR-CCM+ | 4 | September 15, 2015 04:31 |
[ICEM] Flow channel meshing problems | StefanG | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 19 | May 15, 2012 07:44 |
[ANSYS Meshing] Meshing strategy for External Flows | Hybrid | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 0 | January 24, 2012 15:27 |