CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ANSYS Meshing] Cartesian cut cell method - interfaces

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 21, 2016, 08:46
Default Cartesian cut cell method - interfaces
  #1
New Member
 
Rob Vervoort
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 11
RobV is on a distinguished road
For a project I am trying to model a moving fan and the air flow generated by the fan using a sliding mesh.
To be able to use the sliding mesh, interfaces are required at the edges of the fluid domain in which my fan is positioned.

I am currently trying to generate a grid using the cartesian cut cell method (in ANSYS). I made named selections for the faces that are supposed to be interfaces. However during the assembly meshing proces, the faces of the fan zone and the adjacent zone are merged. Therefore it is not possible to create an interface at the intersection of two zones.

Is there a way to create interfaces in a cut cell mesh?

PS: I tried to model the fan using a moving reference frame (moving fan cell zone around z-axis at 94 rad/s) without interfaces at the moving zone. The obtained results are very strange in that case (see attachment). The fan seems to move the air in two directions.
Attached Images
File Type: png contour_Zvel.png (30.0 KB, 87 views)
File Type: jpg fan.jpg (49.2 KB, 98 views)
File Type: jpg mesh_unit.jpg (146.3 KB, 122 views)
RobV is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 21, 2016, 21:22
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 584
Rep Power: 14
Kapi is on a distinguished road
in your geometry, click on the body/part which has interface surface.
in the details on left side change "SHARED TOPOLOGY METHOD" from Automatic to Imprints.

This will make sure you have 2 surfaces and they have imprints on each other at connection.

Also give fixed reference and inlet and outlet of fan surface for direction of flow.
Kapi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 22, 2016, 02:58
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Rob Vervoort
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 11
RobV is on a distinguished road
Thank you for your reply.
However, the part below is still a bit unclear to me.
It will not be possible to assign an in and outlet to the fan's domain because the interfaces are there.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapi View Post
Also give fixed reference and inlet and outlet of fan surface for direction of flow.
Could you explain this in more detail?
RobV is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 22, 2016, 03:34
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Onur Özcan
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Istanbul/Turkey
Posts: 461
Rep Power: 12
oozcan is on a distinguished road
Have you assigned faces being interface as named selection in DM or Ansys-Meshing?
oozcan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 22, 2016, 04:02
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Rob Vervoort
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 11
RobV is on a distinguished road
I assigned them in ANSYS meshing.
RobV is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 22, 2016, 04:07
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Onur Özcan
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Istanbul/Turkey
Posts: 461
Rep Power: 12
oozcan is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobV View Post
I assigned them in ANSYS meshing.
actually there is no need to give all faces as named selection.

Contact faces are already interface. there is enough to give remaining faces as named selection.

Here is what you have to do is that you should select ''automatic'' in shared topo in DM. if you use FLUENT as solver, it is going to already recall interfaces, moreover, you dont have to use ''mesh interfaces'' in FLUENT as well.(you could see that in boundary conditions tab, interior, shadow-wall etc.)
oozcan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 22, 2016, 18:20
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 584
Rep Power: 14
Kapi is on a distinguished road
Rob,

there should be an interface between
air and fan inlet
also,
fan outlet and air
this way the air knows whr to enter and whr to exit!

I havent modelled what u r modelling but I do use fan without blades with right air flow equation of fan. so my fan is just a box with right boundary conditions.
Kapi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 28, 2016, 04:03
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Rob Vervoort
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 11
RobV is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapi View Post
in your geometry, click on the body/part which has interface surface.
in the details on left side change "SHARED TOPOLOGY METHOD" from Automatic to Imprints.

This will make sure you have 2 surfaces and they have imprints on each other at connection.

Also give fixed reference and inlet and outlet of fan surface for direction of flow.
Thanks for the reply but this did not work for me.
When loading the mesh into fluent, fluent keeps removing one of the two interfaces. I really need these interfaces even though some people say I do not. Any suggestions?
RobV is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 28, 2016, 04:25
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Onur Özcan
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Istanbul/Turkey
Posts: 461
Rep Power: 12
oozcan is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobV View Post
Thanks for the reply but this did not work for me.
When loading the mesh into fluent, fluent keeps removing one of the two interfaces. I really need these interfaces even though some people say I do not. Any suggestions?
could you please use mapped face meshing in all interfaces?
oozcan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 28, 2016, 04:58
Default
  #10
New Member
 
Rob Vervoort
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 11
RobV is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by oozcan View Post
could you please use mapped face meshing in all interfaces?
Mapped face sizing is not possible when using the cut-cell method (due to the fact that it is an assembly mesh).
RobV is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 28, 2016, 05:09
Default
  #11
Senior Member
 
Onur Özcan
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Istanbul/Turkey
Posts: 461
Rep Power: 12
oozcan is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobV View Post
Mapped face sizing is not possible when using the cut-cell method (due to the fact that it is an assembly mesh).
well, please read my first second post.
oozcan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 28, 2016, 05:29
Default
  #12
New Member
 
Rob Vervoort
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 11
RobV is on a distinguished road
I do need interfaces, they are required for MRF and Sliding Mesh methods.
RobV is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 28, 2016, 05:30
Default
  #13
Senior Member
 
Onur Özcan
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Istanbul/Turkey
Posts: 461
Rep Power: 12
oozcan is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobV View Post
I do need interfaces, they are required for MRF and Sliding Mesh methods.
ok, you need to do second post I have written,
oozcan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 28, 2016, 14:18
Default
  #14
New Member
 
Rob Vervoort
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 11
RobV is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by oozcan View Post
actually there is no need to give all faces as named selection.

Contact faces are already interface. there is enough to give remaining faces as named selection.

Here is what you have to do is that you should select ''automatic'' in shared topo in DM. if you use FLUENT as solver, it is going to already recall interfaces, moreover, you dont have to use ''mesh interfaces'' in FLUENT as well.(you could see that in boundary conditions tab, interior, shadow-wall etc.)
You write that I don't require interfaces. I know that ansys meshing automatically makes contact regions when making the assembly mesh. I however, want to assign them manually in Fluent (because it is required when I want to model a moving zone). Did anyone succeed to make interfaces for a (cutcell) assembly mesh?
RobV is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 30, 2017, 09:20
Default
  #15
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
leecx is on a distinguished road
hi Rob. Did u manage to figure out how to create interfaces in cutcell mesh?
I am getting the same problem, thx
leecx is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cartesian Cut-Cell Method - Help needed! sujithsubramanian Main CFD Forum 3 November 6, 2017 00:30
interFoam running blowing up sandy13 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 May 5, 2015 08:16
Computing flux for split cell (concave cell) in cut-cell Cartesian method nguyenpt Main CFD Forum 1 December 2, 2014 06:18
Cartecian Cut Cell Method DR.K.Thiruvenkatasamy Main CFD Forum 4 January 29, 2007 07:18
Help for cut cell scheme for moving problems Wei Main CFD Forum 0 August 2, 2006 10:32


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:47.