|
[Sponsors] |
[ANSYS Meshing] Mesh refinement in both axial & radial direction for 3D annular-tubular geometry |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 1, 2016, 11:55 |
Mesh refinement in both axial & radial direction for 3D annular-tubular geometry
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi, I would very much appreciate some help with a meshing problem in Ansys Meshing, to which I am completely new. I am trying to mesh the domain depicted on the left picture (xy-cross-section) as sketched on the right (again, xy-cross-section).
It is a CFD problem where the bottom annular face is the inlet and the top face is the outlet. The annular region needs a fine mesh, which is supposed to get coarser both in the radial and axial direction in the upper tubular part of the domain. I have so far created three different parts/bodies in Design Modeler and in Meshing I am now trying to implement the following concept:
Last edited by trbprnz; November 1, 2016 at 14:44. |
|
November 4, 2016, 08:47 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Gwenael H.
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 392
Rep Power: 20 |
Hi Alex,
You can apply bias in the edge direction you want, you can use the edge sizing tool. RMB on Mesh > insert > sizing. Then use the filter selection tool and pick the edges. Then you can specify either the element size or the number of divisions per edge, and use a bias option. The sweep method needs sometime an additional user input. If it fails you can specify a manual source and target face as well as the default sweep element size. Regarding the mapped face, the “forbidden” symbol just indicates that this mapped face method is not valid for the geometry you’ve selected. You should always think that a mapped face “needs” 4 different sides (like if you’ve squeezed / deformed an initial rectangle to fit your geometrical boundaries). For instance you cannot apply a mapped face method on a triangular face as you only have 3 edges (in this case you need a quarter o-grid / y-grid approach). Moreover if you want a radial distribution do not forget that at the axis centre line you’ll end up with degenerated elements (hex with a collapsed edge). So it would be better to use a multizone method with an inflation layer. |
|
November 8, 2016, 08:00 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi, many thanks for the hints. Managed to create a reasonable hex mesh w/o the radial refinement, as suggested. Great!
|
|
Tags |
bias, cfd, face meshing, meshing |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh can't create refimenet region | clktp | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 3 | February 27, 2022 10:26 |
Gambit problems | Althea | FLUENT | 22 | January 4, 2017 04:19 |
[snappyHexMesh] SHM problem : KVLCC2 with appendage mesh | sc.park | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | March 13, 2016 14:28 |
[snappyHexMesh] Improving prism mesh | me3840 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | April 2, 2014 05:37 |
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? | Joe | CFX | 2 | March 26, 2007 19:10 |