CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ANSYS Meshing] Bad stair stepping causing convergence problems and erroneous results

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 22, 2016, 18:35
Default Bad stair stepping causing convergence problems and erroneous results
  #1
New Member
 
Chris
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 10
cfxturbomode123 is on a distinguished road
Hi,

In my single fluid domain, I have a diffuser vane with a vortex generator on the bottom surface (hub). I am using tetrahedral unstructured meshing with inflation layers around the diffuser vane, shroud and hub so that I can capture separation.

The mesh for the vortex generator (two triangles) is refined using a sphere of influence but I am getting really bad stair stepping as you can see in the attachment. (ANSYS doesn't flag this)

inflation settings:

gap factor 0.5
maximum height over base: 0.1
growth rate type: geometric
Maximum angle 180 degrees
fillet ratio: 0.5
Smoothing iterations: 5

Even with layer compression the problem is still there with little to no improvement (see last attachment).

By the way, the time frame I have does not allow me to use ICEM meshing so please if an expert mesher on this forum has any detailed advice I really appreciate it.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg bad stair stepping 1.jpg (202.3 KB, 62 views)
File Type: jpg top view (vane cavity in middle).jpg (102.3 KB, 49 views)
File Type: jpg vortex generators with sphere of influence.jpg (188.0 KB, 40 views)
File Type: jpg with layer compression.jpg (201.5 KB, 42 views)

Last edited by cfxturbomode123; August 22, 2016 at 18:45. Reason: omission of info
cfxturbomode123 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2016, 06:30
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Paritosh Vasava
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Lappeenranta, Finland
Posts: 732
Rep Power: 23
vasava will become famous soon enough
From pictures it seems that you are using 'Proximity' size function. Have you tried using different 'size functions'? If not, try with 'Fixed' or 'Off' options.

Also, try with 'First layer thickness' option and see how it goes.
vasava is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:53.