|
[Sponsors] |
[ANSYS Meshing] Error: .... because of an edge intersection in the boundary mesh |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 4, 2016, 00:08 |
Error: .... because of an edge intersection in the boundary mesh
|
#1 |
New Member
Lam N
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 10 |
Hello everyone, I am very new to ANSYS Workbench and CFX, and am very thankful and appreciative to all suggestions.
When I am trying to mesh a geometry for CFX analysis, I get: "Error: Patch-conforming tetrahedron mesh failed because of an edge intersection in the boundary mesh." - Geometry is imported as .STEP from Solidworks. Previous iterations with different changes made on a surface I was able to mesh and simulate. However, current iteration (also with a change made on the same surface) gives the error above in Mesh. - I have tried modifying Relevance value. Non-zero values lead to successful mesh but fails in solving or fails in getting desired flow pattern. - I don't have the chance to try ANSYS's tutorials. Although, I have checked the tutorials out and tried different solutions mentioned like Advanced size function, Automatic Inflation/Program controlled inflation, different Methods such as Tetrahedrons/Hex Dominant/Sweeps.... However, it still fails to mesh. Is there anything im missing out or any possibilities for me to try? I appreciate all suggestions and thanks for your time spent. Lam Last edited by thepasser13; May 4, 2016 at 03:02. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Radiation in semi-transparent media with surface-to-surface model? | mpeppels | CFX | 11 | August 22, 2019 08:30 |
[mesh manipulation] Importing Multiple Meshes | thomasnwalshiii | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 18 | December 19, 2015 19:57 |
Moving mesh | Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 122 | June 15, 2014 07:20 |
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file | SSL | FLUENT | 2 | January 26, 2008 12:55 |
Gambit: face mesh starts at edge, not boundary lr | Chris Bailey | FLUENT | 0 | December 5, 2005 14:50 |