|
[Sponsors] |
April 1, 2016, 14:07 |
mesh problems
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi all,
Please see the attached screenshot of my geometry. I am modelling the extraction of a blood clot. Blood primary phase, blood clot secondary. VOF multiphase model. The problem is when running the solution the velocity field keeps dirverging and error comes up saying global courant number greater than 250. I think it is due to the quality of my mesh. At the moment my minimum orthogonal quality is 0.24. It could be because there is a change of diameter in my geometry. I tried the solution with a tube with constant diameter and it worked (same settings). So what would be the best way to mesh my geometry? Any assistance would be much appreciated |
|
April 2, 2016, 11:48 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 10 |
Anyone? It is needed for my university project which is due in next week! Help would be much appreciated.
|
|
April 3, 2016, 18:17 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
|
Since your mesh only has 26k elements, why not try and increase that by an order of magnitude? Add some edge sizing refinement at the location of the diameter change maybe...
__________________
If you're in need of some free quality CFD video tutorials - check out SiriusCFD @ YouTube |
|
April 3, 2016, 19:39 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi thank you for replying. Would relevance increase the order of magnitude? Also, I am solving via a non-iterative time advancement to reduce calculation time. The solution doesn't solve this way, only by hybrid initialization. Is a different type of mesh required for non-iterative?
|
|
April 4, 2016, 07:09 |
|
#5 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
If possible, do the hexa mesh and I am sure you will find pretty good tutorials for exactly same geometry in ICEM CFD hexa. No, different type of mesh is not required. It is more or less depends on the options chosen in solver. |
||
April 4, 2016, 18:22 |
|
#6 | |
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 10 |
Quote:
In my first post, the mesh shown there has a orthogonal quality of 0.24 and for some reason does not run non-iterative advancement. I am keeping the solver settings the same for both meshes. What could be going wrong? |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gambit problems | Althea | FLUENT | 22 | January 4, 2017 04:19 |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh for internal Flow | vishwa | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 24 | June 27, 2016 09:54 |
[mesh manipulation] Importing Multiple Meshes | thomasnwalshiii | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 18 | December 19, 2015 19:57 |
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? | Joe | CFX | 2 | March 26, 2007 19:10 |
How to control Minximum mesh space? | hung | FLUENT | 7 | April 18, 2005 10:38 |