CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ANSYS Meshing] mesh problems

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 1, 2016, 14:07
Default mesh problems
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 10
shotta287 is on a distinguished road
Hi all,
Please see the attached screenshot of my geometry. I am modelling the extraction of a blood clot. Blood primary phase, blood clot secondary. VOF multiphase model. The problem is when running the solution the velocity field keeps dirverging and error comes up saying global courant number greater than 250. I think it is due to the quality of my mesh. At the moment my minimum orthogonal quality is 0.24. It could be because there is a change of diameter in my geometry. I tried the solution with a tube with constant diameter and it worked (same settings). So what would be the best way to mesh my geometry? Any assistance would be much appreciated
Attached Images
File Type: jpg mesh.jpg (135.4 KB, 24 views)
shotta287 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 2, 2016, 11:48
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 10
shotta287 is on a distinguished road
Anyone? It is needed for my university project which is due in next week! Help would be much appreciated.
shotta287 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 3, 2016, 18:17
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
scipy's Avatar
 
Alex Pasic
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Croatia
Posts: 199
Rep Power: 16
scipy is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to scipy
Since your mesh only has 26k elements, why not try and increase that by an order of magnitude? Add some edge sizing refinement at the location of the diameter change maybe...
__________________
If you're in need of some free quality CFD video tutorials - check out SiriusCFD @ YouTube
scipy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 3, 2016, 19:39
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 10
shotta287 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by scipy View Post
Since your mesh only has 26k elements, why not try and increase that by an order of magnitude? Add some edge sizing refinement at the location of the diameter change maybe...
Hi thank you for replying. Would relevance increase the order of magnitude? Also, I am solving via a non-iterative time advancement to reduce calculation time. The solution doesn't solve this way, only by hybrid initialization. Is a different type of mesh required for non-iterative?
shotta287 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 4, 2016, 07:09
Default
  #5
Far
Senior Member
 
Sijal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,558
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 54
Far has a spectacular aura aboutFar has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Quote:
Originally Posted by shotta287 View Post
Hi thank you for replying. Would relevance increase the order of magnitude? Also, I am solving via a non-iterative time advancement to reduce calculation time. The solution doesn't solve this way, only by hybrid initialization. Is a different type of mesh required for non-iterative?
order of magnitude means multiplication by 10. So increase the mes to 0.26 million and check your solution. And definitely edge sizing, relevance etc will refine the mesh.

If possible, do the hexa mesh and I am sure you will find pretty good tutorials for exactly same geometry in ICEM CFD hexa.

No, different type of mesh is not required. It is more or less depends on the options chosen in solver.
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 4, 2016, 18:22
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 10
shotta287 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Far View Post
order of magnitude means multiplication by 10. So increase the mes to 0.26 million and check your solution. And definitely edge sizing, relevance etc will refine the mesh.

If possible, do the hexa mesh and I am sure you will find pretty good tutorials for exactly same geometry in ICEM CFD hexa.

No, different type of mesh is not required. It is more or less depends on the options chosen in solver.
Please see the attached picture. This geometry also has a default mesh and has a minimum orthogonal quality of 0.62. I am able to run non iterative solution with this.
In my first post, the mesh shown there has a orthogonal quality of 0.24 and for some reason does not run non-iterative advancement. I am keeping the solver settings the same for both meshes. What could be going wrong?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg qws.jpg (85.0 KB, 10 views)
shotta287 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gambit problems Althea FLUENT 22 January 4, 2017 04:19
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh for internal Flow vishwa OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 24 June 27, 2016 09:54
[mesh manipulation] Importing Multiple Meshes thomasnwalshiii OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 18 December 19, 2015 19:57
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? Joe CFX 2 March 26, 2007 19:10
How to control Minximum mesh space? hung FLUENT 7 April 18, 2005 10:38


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:59.