|
[Sponsors] |
[ICEM] Simple 2D problem, not simple enough (for me) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 26, 2015, 22:53 |
Simple 2D problem, not simple enough (for me)
|
#1 |
New Member
Jimbob
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
POSSIBLY SOLVED! see reply
I have a stepped 2D duct. A tapered edge returns to the upper wall of the duct which is parallel to the lower wall. See below: The issue I'm having is creating a good, structured mesh in ICEM for exporting to fluent. I create 9 blocks, then delete the top middle & right, and the middle before associating curves to edges. I've tried merging blocks, linking/unsplitting edges. The nodes along length (A) always match (B). I'd rather have node count on (A) = (B)+(D). What am I doing wrong? Thanks Last edited by MKIndyR1; November 27, 2015 at 01:18. |
|
November 27, 2015, 01:17 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Jimbob
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Might now be solved...
Took a while. I stumbled on a good looking pre-mesh, I couldn't replicate it for a long time, and when I did it wouldn't load into ICEM because of open edges. I removed some blocks and merged two, to get the below: This gives a much better, uniform looking mesh after the taper: The cell aspect ratio is way off but at least it can be imported into Fluent. |
|
Tags |
nodes blocking edge edges |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
simple heat transfer problem | openfoam1 | OpenFOAM | 2 | January 27, 2010 15:17 |
Problem with SIMPLE algorithm | katakgoreng | Main CFD Forum | 4 | December 28, 2009 05:09 |
Simple Meshing Problem with Gambit | Mario | FLUENT | 4 | April 18, 2003 10:52 |
SIMPLE code for 3_D problem | bobby | Main CFD Forum | 1 | December 26, 2000 00:20 |
? Simple CFD problem | Davy | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 21, 1998 07:19 |