|
[Sponsors] |
August 14, 2013, 05:34 |
Edge Parameters Question
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 27 |
Hi,
I use ICEM 14.5 Hexa to mesh some geometry. Now, one of the edges doesn't behave as I expect: I use "Exponential2" mesh law, what I want is
The question is: How can I let ICEM choose the ratios so I get the two mesh spacings?
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower. |
|
August 14, 2013, 10:33 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 552
Rep Power: 20 |
I guess it also depends upon the initial size. Try playing with that.
|
|
August 14, 2013, 11:09 |
|
#3 |
Super Moderator
Ghazlani M. Ali
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 1,385
Blog Entries: 23
Rep Power: 29 |
if you have one edge of 1 mm, and decided to add two nodes in the middle with a uniform spacing of 0.1. you can't, it is impossible. you need to add more node, ie 10 nodes in total. you figured it out by yourself.
|
|
August 14, 2013, 11:12 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 27 |
What I was wondering about:
When I start with 0.005 spacing, why can ICEM end with a certain value on the other side, but not with a smaller value? Should be pretty simple, when the initial growth rate is reduced... Edit: If I understand the ICEM help correctly, using "Exponential" I can only choose the first cell height and the number of nodes, everything else is calculated. Can anyone confirm that?
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower. |
|
August 15, 2013, 11:11 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,663
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 47 |
You could interactively and iteratively adjust your ratio 2 (with your number of nodes fixed) and see if it gives you the size you are looking for...
If you have enough nodes, it may work out. At the moment, the ratio is growing too fast so Spacing 1 is getting too large. Reduce Ratio 2 and see what happens.
__________________
----------------------------------------- Please help guide development at ANSYS by filling in these surveys Public ANSYS ICEM CFD Users Survey This second one is more general (Gambit, TGrid and ANSYS Meshing users welcome)... CFD Online Users Survey |
|
August 15, 2013, 11:13 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,663
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 47 |
I should point out (in case it isn't obvious), that Exponential 2 does not take your spacing 1 setting into account. If you want it to, you can use one of the other options (such as bi exponential).
You could also choose the option "From Graphs" and switch the Graph function to "exponential" and control it that way. Best regards, Simo
__________________
----------------------------------------- Please help guide development at ANSYS by filling in these surveys Public ANSYS ICEM CFD Users Survey This second one is more general (Gambit, TGrid and ANSYS Meshing users welcome)... CFD Online Users Survey |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Meshing a Sphere | Ajay | FLUENT | 10 | September 3, 2016 15:18 |
Unanswered question | niklas | OpenFOAM | 2 | July 31, 2013 17:03 |
[snappyHexMesh] Understanding feature edge refinement and snapping | Horus | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | May 31, 2012 13:08 |
New to CFX-need explanations about mesh parameters | Cyril | CFX | 3 | November 24, 2006 07:33 |
question | K.L.Huang | Siemens | 1 | March 29, 2000 05:57 |