CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[GAMBIT] periodic boundary condition for a rectangular duct domain

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 5, 2013, 02:01
Default periodic boundary condition for a rectangular duct domain
  #1
Das
New Member
 
Ayyappadas G
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 13
Das is on a distinguished road
Hi all,

I am new to CFD and i m doing a work on the film cooling on a flat plate, and i used gambit for modelling a 3D rectangular geometry as a domain. The bottom face of the rectangular duct is the taken as the test plate.

I gave the following boundary conditions:-

1. duct inlet > Velocity inlet
2. duct outlet> pressure outlet
3. test plate > wall
4. Top side> wall( opp face of test plate)
5. right side face> symmetry
6. left side face> Periodic

After that i did export > mesh, but the file is not exporting successfully.

It is showing some errors with the periodic boundary condition,
warn: boundary entity periodic side shadow does not contain any valid entity and is not written.
error: periodic boundary entities are not specified on the same boundary entity.

please help... what is the error and how can I resolve it...

thanks in advance
Das is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 5, 2013, 09:44
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
can you attach a sketch of your geometry with your BC.
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 5, 2013, 13:47
Default
  #3
Das
New Member
 
Ayyappadas G
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 13
Das is on a distinguished road
thanks for showing interest to help me, sir
here i m attaching its sketch...

i did this in gambit...
for the left face of the duct i want to giv periodic boundary condition.

how can I resolve it...sir
Attached Images
File Type: jpg isometric view.jpg (48.6 KB, 122 views)
File Type: jpg coolant hole.jpg (56.5 KB, 86 views)
Das is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 5, 2013, 14:10
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
can show where is the periodic BC on the picture?
Periodicity has some rules to be well defined
Anyway your splits around your cylinder are wrong, since it will generate skewed cells.
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 7, 2013, 06:14
Default
  #5
Das
New Member
 
Ayyappadas G
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 13
Das is on a distinguished road
i gave periodic boundary condition for the flat side(opposite to the face having semicircle groove) of the rectangular domain.

sir, here i m supposed to model a film cooling over a falt plate.

in actual experimental setup consist of a rectangular duct with a test plate at the base portion of the rectangle, where the test plate contains certain number of holes inclined at 35 deg to the streamwise direction. hot stream of air is fed through the inlet pace of the rectangle while coolant air is blown through inclined holes.

for reducing the iteration, i took one half of the coolant hole for modelling...

here i m attaching the top view of the test plate of actual experimental setup.

that section shown by dotted line is taken in to consideration for the simulation.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg test plate.jpg (44.1 KB, 84 views)
Das is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 8, 2013, 02:48
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
ok
Then you shouldn't use the symetry, and you have to model the reflected zone.
Thus, as I said, periodic BC has some rules: mesh from both periodic surfaces has to be linked, and you should give at least 2 surfaces (not coplanar) in the BC set
check this tutorial: http://aerojet.engr.ucdavis.edu/flue.../tg/node26.htm
ranasa likes this.
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 9, 2013, 06:08
Default
  #7
Das
New Member
 
Ayyappadas G
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 13
Das is on a distinguished road
thank you...sir
Das is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 23, 2013, 08:21
Default
  #8
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 13
niloogh is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by -mAx- View Post
ok
Then you shouldn't use the symetry, and you have to model the reflected zone.
Thus, as I said, periodic BC has some rules: mesh from both periodic surfaces has to be linked, and you should give at least 2 surfaces (not coplanar) in the BC set
check this tutorial: http://aerojet.engr.ucdavis.edu/flue.../tg/node26.htm
hi max
would you please take a look at my geometry.
i don't know to use symmetry BC or periodic for the surfaces which i had labeled in the photo

it is a 120 degree model of a wind turbine.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg mm.JPG (39.8 KB, 65 views)
niloogh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 23, 2013, 09:01
Default
  #9
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
periodic: all surfaces which belongs to plane (yz) are supposed to be mesh-linked with the surfaces which belongs to 120°-rotated (yz)
That means that both suface-groups have exactly same mesh, which allows you to use periodicity.
Now I don't remember how to define the periodic BC: all surfaces as one BC, or each plane as a BC, etc...
But I think, you only need one BC
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 23, 2013, 09:30
Default
  #10
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 13
niloogh is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by -mAx- View Post
periodic: all surfaces which belongs to plane (yz) are supposed to be mesh-linked with the surfaces which belongs to 120°-rotated (yz)
That means that both suface-groups have exactly same mesh, which allows you to use periodicity.
Now I don't remember how to define the periodic BC: all surfaces as one BC, or each plane as a BC, etc...
But I think, you only need one BC


you mean,after meshing all the volume,i must go to "link face meshes" panel and choose the faces which are going to be linked??

and i don't know to choose what for vertices which are needed in this panel???
niloogh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 23, 2013, 10:14
Default
  #11
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
no before meshing the volume. Thus you will have to modify the surface mesh.
I confirm you need to set all your periodic surfaces as one periodic BC (in my case the 4 color surfaces)
Sans titre.jpg
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 23, 2013, 17:23
Default
  #12
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 13
niloogh is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by -mAx- View Post
no before meshing the volume. Thus you will have to modify the surface mesh.
I confirm you need to set all your periodic surfaces as one periodic BC (in my case the 4 color surfaces)
Attachment 22045
tnx for your help.
i had done it successfully but

after using this mesh in fluent and starting itarating i recived this message:
Error: divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction
Error: divergence detected in AMG solver: x-momentum
Error: divergence detected in AMG solver

why is that?
is that related to my mesh???
niloogh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2013, 02:13
Default
  #13
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
could be many things
Check all your BC (set up).
If you don't see anything, then you may try to set your periodic BC as wall, and iterate (just to see if it comes from periodicity).
And off course a check mesh
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2013, 05:34
Default
  #14
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 13
niloogh is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by -mAx- View Post
could be many things
Check all your BC (set up).
If you don't see anything, then you may try to set your periodic BC as wall, and iterate (just to see if it comes from periodicity).
And off course a check mesh
i,m sure that it comes from my periodic boundary.
because when i used symmetry instead of periodic.i did,t have this problem.
but i don't know what i must change about this periodic bcs
niloogh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2013, 05:52
Default
  #15
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
how did you set it?
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2013, 06:24
Default
  #16
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 13
niloogh is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by -mAx- View Post
how did you set it?
i linked the faces as you said just without ticking the periodic in "link face meshes" panel.
after that i meshed all of my volume with tetra.and set the periodic for every both linked faces and saved it as mesh and sent it to fluent.
niloogh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2013, 06:31
Default
  #17
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
I meant how did you set it in fluent?
http://aerojet.engr.ucdavis.edu/flue...4.htm#Periodic
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2013, 06:43
Default
  #18
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 13
niloogh is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by -mAx- View Post
I meant how did you set it in fluent?
http://aerojet.engr.ucdavis.edu/flue...4.htm#Periodic
I set it as rotational.and i didn't do any thing else in fluent for this bc.
niloogh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2013, 07:05
Default
  #19
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
what gives your a check mesh?
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2013, 07:18
Default
  #20
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 13
niloogh is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by -mAx- View Post
what gives your a check mesh?
Grid Check

Domain Extents:
x-coordinate: min (m) = -1.194447e+005, max (m) = -1.000000e+002
y-coordinate: min (m) = -1.680000e+005, max (m) = 6.120000e+005
z-coordinate: min (m) = -1.200000e+005, max (m) = 6.000000e+004
Volume statistics:
minimum volume (m3): 1.474610e+002
maximum volume (m3): 2.305678e+012
total volume (m3): 1.166610e+016
Face area statistics:
minimum face area (m2): 5.263843e+000
maximum face area (m2): 3.819772e+008
Checking number of nodes per cell.
Checking number of faces per cell.
Checking thread pointers.
Checking number of cells per face.
Checking face cells.
Checking bridge faces.
Checking right-handed cells.
Checking face handedness.
Checking face node order.
Checking element type consistency.
Checking boundary types:
Checking face pairs.
Checking periodic boundaries.
Zone 6: x-translation: min (m) = 0.000000e+000, max (m) = 1.029000e+005
y-translation: min (m) = 0.000000e+000, max (m) = 0.000000e+000
z-translation: min (m) = -1.800000e+005, max (m) = 0.000000e+000
Zone 8: x-translation: min (m) = -1.029000e+005, max (m) = 0.000000e+000
y-translation: min (m) = -3.955078e-002, max (m) = 3.878906e+000
z-translation: min (m) = 0.000000e+000, max (m) = 1.800000e+005
Zone 10: x-translation: min (m) = -1.029000e+005, max (m) = 0.000000e+000
y-translation: min (m) = 0.000000e+000, max (m) = 0.000000e+000
z-translation: min (m) = 0.000000e+000, max (m) = 1.800000e+005
Checking node count.
Checking nosolve cell count.
Checking nosolve face count.
Checking face children.
Checking cell children.
Checking storage.
Done.
niloogh is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Domain Imbalance HMR CFX 5 October 10, 2016 06:57
Error finding variable "THERMX" sunilpatil CFX 8 April 26, 2013 08:00
domain imbalance for enrgy equation happy CFX 14 September 6, 2012 02:54
New topic on same subject - Flow around race car Tudor Miron CFX 15 April 2, 2004 07:18


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:52.