|
[Sponsors] |
[ICEM] Transition layers from quad (or hexa) coarse mesh to quad (or hexa) fine mesh? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 4, 2012, 19:36 |
Transition layers from quad (or hexa) coarse mesh to quad (or hexa) fine mesh?
|
#1 |
Senior Member
François Grégoire
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 392
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi,
Is it possible to build a quad (or hexa) transition mesh like the mesh in the attached image? Not necessarily a right-angled mesh, but a somewhat structured quad (or hexa) transition mesh, preferably with blocking. Can Fluent handle that kind of mesh? (my first guess is no...) Thanks ahead, François |
|
December 4, 2012, 23:17 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
|
It is possible to make the similar mesh in ICEM Hexa. Just choose the refinement factor (1:2, 1:3 etc). But Fluent only accepts the factor 1:2 in adjacent cells, so getting similar mesh as in ICEM you need to make as many blocks as there is transition in the model. Got it?
Just an example, I can judge from pic, you need alteast 4 blocks to get the similar mesh. |
|
December 5, 2012, 10:52 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
François Grégoire
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 392
Rep Power: 17 |
Ok, I got the mesh refinement in Icem with Blocking => Pre-Mesh Params => Refinement... see attached image. The problem is the export to Fluent, I get various errors because of the bad coupling between blocks. Do I have to edit the Blocking mesh (Blocking => some operation...) or the converted unstructured mesh (Edit Mesh => some operation...)? I didn't find a way to export a .msh without errors.
|
|
February 10, 2014, 07:09 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Adam Læssøe
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 13 |
The step-wise refinement is potentially quite usefull. But it quickly becomes tedious to create new blocks for every additional level of refinement (to be compatible with Fluent). Is there a way to do so automagically?
So for example: Select block to be refined; Select ref. dimension; Select ref. factor; Select maximum step change (which would then be 2). Which would then result in a transition like in François' OP. (I realize this is an old thread. But since I landed here with google, and this is directly relevant, hopefully you don't mind me reviving.) |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gambit problems | Althea | FLUENT | 22 | January 4, 2017 04:19 |
inflation layers for hexa mesh using icem cfd | Apple | CFX | 4 | January 6, 2012 01:12 |
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? | Joe | CFX | 2 | March 26, 2007 19:10 |
CFdesign behaviour in coarse and fine mesh | Farhad | Autodesk Simulation CFD | 0 | May 30, 2006 11:10 |
How to control Minximum mesh space? | hung | FLUENT | 7 | April 18, 2005 10:38 |