|
[Sponsors] |
December 1, 2012, 13:19 |
Help mesh a pipe cross
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 13 |
Hello everybody,
I'm sorry to post this here, but i've been searching for a while and i can't do this properly. I need to study the flow within a pipe cross like this: But i can only get this type of mesh, which i believe is not the best one: I read about blocking and separating the part at the junctions, but i don't know how to do it in desingmodeler. I also need to do it with three pipes crossing. I really need your help. Thank you so much in advance! |
|
December 1, 2012, 14:38 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Ghazlani M. Ali
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 1,385
Blog Entries: 23
Rep Power: 29 |
take a look here, hope it can help you
http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ans...s-meshing.html |
|
December 3, 2012, 06:01 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 13 |
Thank you for the answer.
Just another question: So I don't need to divide the geometry in DM because the multizone does that for me? Even if it is a bit more complex than just a simple tube? And is the mesh that I have now, good? Thank you |
|
December 3, 2012, 06:04 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 13 |
||
December 3, 2012, 13:56 |
|
#5 | |
Super Moderator
Ghazlani M. Ali
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 1,385
Blog Entries: 23
Rep Power: 29 |
Quote:
About the link you sent me, this is done using Gambit, it can also be done using ICEM CFD. Start working on that if you want, there are good tutorial and training material that can help do that, it doesn't take too much time... we can assist you too |
||
December 5, 2012, 12:07 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 13 |
I've been reading the tutorials and it says that multizone automatically decomposes the geometry. I've tried decomposing myself and it then sweep it, but i found that the elements grew worse than with multizone. So i believe this is the best method.
Thanks diamondx for helping me! |
|
December 6, 2012, 07:51 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
|
Lots of slicing in DesignModeler together with Multizone meshing will produce the following. It's faster in ICEM if you know it, otherwise it may be a good choice for you.
|
|
December 7, 2012, 05:04 |
|
#8 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 13 |
jrunsten, thank you so much!
In fact when I use multiblock, the mesh in the middle becomes triangular instead of quad. And I read it should be quad in order to get best results. How did you decide where to slice the part? I mean the dimensions? Is it a "more or less like this", or do you have specific places where to slice? Once again, thank you! |
|
December 7, 2012, 05:39 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
|
This was just some random dimensions i chose, but basically it is all scliced using planes rotated 45 degrees about the origin and then I merged the resulting pieces into the bodies i wanted. Don't forget to create a new part from the final bodies. The only dimension I set for this is the size of the square in the middle.
In ICEM, i guess this would correspond setting the size of the ogrid. You can my files here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/butno8c91xeb7hq/cross.wbpz Maybe it can help someone |
|
December 11, 2012, 03:41 |
|
#10 |
Senior Member
|
@jrunsten Good work. I have two queries:
1. How did you get the hexa meshing at the interface of four pipes (or intersection of two pipes) 2. How to make the wbpz workbench file. |
|
December 11, 2012, 03:55 |
|
#11 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
2. In Workbench, choose File>>Archive. The option to restore an archive is directly below. |
||
December 11, 2012, 04:10 |
|
#13 |
Senior Member
|
Ah ok,
Well I think all the info is here anyway. Perform the slices with your preffered method, create a multibody part and then mesh them all together with a multizone method. For fine grid at the walls, right click the Multizone method and choose "Inflate this method". Choose the correct wall surfaces for each inflation instance and it should work just fine. |
|
December 11, 2012, 04:44 |
|
#14 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi, I have version 13, so I'm not able to open.
I tried to split the body, and I can, but I get a lot of parts, and then I'm not able to merge some parts back together (in DesignModeler). Can you please explain to me how you do that? Thank you! |
|
December 11, 2012, 04:47 |
|
#15 |
Senior Member
|
Create>>Boolean, Unite
|
|
December 11, 2012, 05:32 |
|
#16 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 13 |
Thank you so much for all your help! I managed to divide it. It took me a while! Thank you
|
|
December 11, 2012, 09:59 |
|
#17 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi,
I don't know if it was posted before, but I can't find it. Is there anyway that I can do a mesh just to one and then replicate it in others? Like if I want these 4 of these crosses connected, can I make a mesh just for the first cross and then make a pattern to mesh the following crosses? |
|
December 11, 2012, 10:40 |
|
#18 |
Senior Member
|
Not that I'm aware of. You can certainly make a pattern of the geometry in DM, but not in meshing. A bit more work meshing four of them, but not that much.
|
|
December 11, 2012, 11:10 |
|
#19 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 13 |
I did it in DM, but when I try to mesh it, it takes forever, and I end up stoping the mesh... Is there any way I can speed it up?
|
|
December 11, 2012, 11:23 |
|
#20 |
Senior Member
|
Four in a row or 2x2 like a square?
|
|
Tags |
ansys meshing, cross, pipe, pipe cross, pipe juction |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] Boundary layer in a pipe | Clementhuon | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 6 | March 12, 2012 13:41 |
[snappyHexMesh] No Surface-Layers on pipe with hexagonal cross sectional area | U.Golling | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | December 10, 2010 10:08 |
[blockMesh] generate a graded pipe mesh. | jenright | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | August 22, 2009 09:58 |
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? | Joe | CFX | 2 | March 26, 2007 19:10 |
Terrible Mistake In Fluid Dynamics History | Abhi | Main CFD Forum | 12 | July 8, 2002 10:11 |