|
[Sponsors] |
October 10, 2012, 23:55 |
Meshing strategy for 3D sharp point
|
#1 |
New Member
Fan Derrick He
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sydeny
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 14 |
Do you guys think this sharp point can be meshed well with hexa grids? any suggestions on the meshing strategy?
Looking forward to your replies, thank you! |
|
October 11, 2012, 00:03 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Ghazlani M. Ali
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 1,385
Blog Entries: 23
Rep Power: 29 |
hmmm very difficult...
I once face a sharp geometry but not like this one. i had to use y-grid. take a look at this video, there is no sound but i added annotations: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuiRkZqaEz4 try it with this method , come back to us here let us know how was it |
|
October 11, 2012, 00:25 |
|
#3 |
Super Moderator
Ghazlani M. Ali
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 1,385
Blog Entries: 23
Rep Power: 29 |
wait a second; y-grid needs to be applied to triangular shapes... yours is not...
just realized that while laying in my bed May i ask what are you trying to model ? |
|
October 11, 2012, 01:01 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Fan Derrick He
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sydeny
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 14 |
Modelling? you mean CFD analysis? I am modelling the air flowing across this cone shape, so I have a cylinder enclosing the cone shape. but around the sharp point, the aspect ratio and skewness of the grids are kind of poor. Does this answer your doubt?
|
|
October 12, 2012, 02:04 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
david
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 14 |
I once meshed a geometry with a sharp end. I used the quarter O grid blocking method for the sharp end. Maybe you can give that a go.
|
|
October 12, 2012, 08:44 |
|
#7 | |
New Member
Fan Derrick He
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sydeny
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 14 |
Quote:
Best Regards D-willism |
||
October 12, 2012, 08:45 |
|
#8 |
New Member
Fan Derrick He
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sydeny
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 14 |
I will try that once I get to university tomorrow. thx
|
|
October 12, 2012, 21:42 |
|
#10 |
New Member
Fan Derrick He
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sydeny
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 14 |
zip file includes 2 geometries I am trying now.
Best Regards D-willism |
|
October 13, 2012, 04:43 |
|
#11 |
Senior Member
|
For rectangular enclosure blocking is simple. Min quality is 0.9, however min angle is 16.9. Try solving this mesh in Fluent.
Circular Enclosure: The blocking of this geometry with circular enclosure is felt difficult to me always. Can someone guide us how to handle the circular domain in efficient way? Last edited by Far; July 18, 2014 at 06:59. |
|
October 13, 2012, 05:02 |
|
#13 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
||
October 13, 2012, 05:27 |
|
#14 |
New Member
Fan Derrick He
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sydeny
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 14 |
Thank you SO SO SO much! You've been very kind
|
|
October 13, 2012, 06:43 |
|
#15 |
New Member
Fan Derrick He
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sydeny
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 14 |
When I opened the project file using ICEM CFD 14.0, it required a attribute file? But obviously it is not in the file you posted, does it really matter? And hmm... because you adjusted the angle from 16 to 18, the min quality degrades and not the same as what you show us in the picture. Could you please post the files before you made angle adjustments please if you can? Thank you so much!!
Best Regards D-willism |
|
October 13, 2012, 07:15 |
|
#16 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
In this mesh min quality is 0.8 and min angle is 18. Please uncheck the solid part if it is turned-on... |
||
October 14, 2012, 00:05 |
|
#17 |
New Member
Fan Derrick He
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sydeny
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 14 |
Thank you Far! I am now trying to block and mesh the geometry without having those wedge-shape blocks at the bottom of the geometry, which means only four blocks left enclosing the semi-cone (solid, as you named in the file). Do you think it is feasible?
Best Regards D-willism |
|
October 14, 2012, 02:45 |
|
#18 |
Senior Member
|
I am sending you two project files (both include .prj, .blk and .tin). That is before merging the vertices and then after merging the appropriate vertices. Now you can apply the Y-block option on two wedge shapes blocks to get what I posted earlier.
PS. I have also used the build topology command to create the points at the required locations. I have also used the ungroup curves command, available in blocking association panel |
|
October 14, 2012, 03:50 |
|
#20 |
New Member
Fan Derrick He
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sydeny
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 14 |
Thank you Far! what I was trying to say is: do you reckon if it is feasible or possible to block the domain into four sub blocks, instead of including small wedge-like blocks as well underneath the sub blocks (big/major ones)?
Best Regards D-willism |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Meshing issue in sharp edges | Moti | Siemens | 7 | June 1, 2012 13:40 |
How to mesh the 1st grid point? | Daniel | Main CFD Forum | 1 | October 8, 2007 03:27 |
Singularity of grid?Volume meshing vs face meshing | Ken | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 4, 2003 12:09 |
meshing a sharp edge | line | CFX | 2 | November 2, 2002 12:19 |
CFX4.3 -build analysis form | Chie Min | CFX | 5 | July 13, 2001 00:19 |