|
[Sponsors] |
October 14, 2012, 04:00 |
|
#21 |
Senior Member
|
Can you show it with pics? because I am not getting the concept of four blocks. There are initially seven blocks. One is solid, two are in parallel to solid block and touching the cone, two other blocks are on top of these two blocks and other two blocks are in the front domain.
|
|
October 15, 2012, 07:03 |
|
#22 | |
New Member
Fan Derrick He
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sydeny
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 14 |
Quote:
I mean get rid of those two blocks that touch the cone. Only keep 4 blocks, 2 in the front and 2 at the back. make those 2 blocks at the back larger enough so that they can take the place of those block that touch the cone and keep the original domain shape. Thank you Best Regards D-willism |
||
October 15, 2012, 07:06 |
|
#23 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
||
May 14, 2020, 16:55 |
Quality for O-Grids
|
#24 | |
New Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Turkey
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
I am facing a similar issue with a slightly more complex problem, image attached. Can you kindly suggest how to improve quality on this one? I am getting negative values of determinants in only one of the six quarter o-grids I have made for the streamline body on which the props are mounted. |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Meshing issue in sharp edges | Moti | Siemens | 7 | June 1, 2012 13:40 |
How to mesh the 1st grid point? | Daniel | Main CFD Forum | 1 | October 8, 2007 03:27 |
Singularity of grid?Volume meshing vs face meshing | Ken | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 4, 2003 12:09 |
meshing a sharp edge | line | CFX | 2 | November 2, 2002 12:19 |
CFX4.3 -build analysis form | Chie Min | CFX | 5 | July 13, 2001 00:19 |