|
[Sponsors] |
March 14, 2011, 17:13 |
pFinal for pisoFoam solver
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 15 |
Hey foamers!
Could somebody explain to me what is the pFinal variable that has to be defined in fvSolution when using pisoFoam? Thanks in advance! L1011 |
|
March 16, 2011, 05:30 |
|
#2 |
Member
Dejan Morar
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi L101,
That is the same like p, but pFinal you use in the final iteration for pressure solving if (corr == nCorr-1 && nonOrth == nNonOrthCorr) // this is final iteration { pEqn.solve(mesh.solver(p.name() + "Final")); } Hope this helps, Dejan |
|
March 16, 2011, 05:57 |
|
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi L101,
I think the basic idea behind pFinal is to have an accurate solution at the end of time step without spending to much time in solving the pressure field for the iterations before. So you can tighter your tolerance for the pressure solver in the pFinal solver settings. This will result in more iterations for the last pressure iteration but in a more accurate solution at the end of time step (which is finally the important result). Best regards Stawrogin |
|
March 16, 2011, 12:59 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 15 |
Thank you guys for your answers!
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
thobois class engineTopoChangerMesh error | Peter_600 | OpenFOAM | 4 | August 2, 2014 10:52 |
Quarter Burner mesh with periosic condition | SamCanuck | FLUENT | 2 | August 31, 2011 12:34 |
Working directory via command line | Luiz | CFX | 4 | March 6, 2011 21:02 |
Getting too many iterations by velocity solving (aborting). Changing U - Solver? | suitup | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | January 20, 2010 08:45 |
compressible two phase flow in CFX4.4 | youngan | CFX | 0 | July 2, 2003 00:32 |