|
[Sponsors] |
June 16, 2011, 03:23 |
Local time step
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Chennai
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 16 |
I want to use local time steps to converge to steady state quickly. I have fixed the maxCo and want to calculate deltaT for each cell (local time step). My Openfoam rho (for e.g.) equation reads :
rho = rho - runTime.deltaT()*fvc::div(phi); ...... I checked setDelta.H, compressibleCourantNo.H which tells runTime.deltaT() as a scalar. But I want a runtime.deltaT() as volScalarField which has delta time defined for each cell. Can anyone help me in this regard |
|
June 16, 2011, 12:10 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
David Gaden
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 437
Rep Power: 22 |
The runTime scalar is used in the fvc and fvm namespaces in the discretization process. If you want to have any of these functions work with the local time, then you are looking at a complex problem. If, on the other hand, you just want to store a "local time" field that you use independently, that would be much easier. How do you plan to use the local time?
|
|
June 16, 2011, 15:16 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Chennai
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 16 |
" If, on the other hand, you just want to store a "local time" field that you use independently, that would be much easier"
Exactly the second one. A false time field just to update rho,rhoU and rhoE For e.g. rho = rho - runTime.deltaT()*fvc::div(phi) rhoU = rhoU - ... rhoE = rhoE - ... runTime.deltaT() is very local (or which only plays around setDelta.H, readTimecontrols.H and compressibleCourantNumber.H) and nothing to do with ddt schemes I specify. (whatever ddtscheme in the fvSchemesDict) & Hopefully, I didn't confuse you Thanks, hari |
|
June 16, 2011, 15:43 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Sandeep Menon
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Amherst, MA
Posts: 403
Rep Power: 25 |
Take a look at the SLTSDdtScheme in $(FOAM_SRC)/finiteVolume/ddtSchemes/SLTSDdtScheme
|
|
June 17, 2011, 05:02 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Anton Kidess
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,377
Rep Power: 30 |
Also, the just released new version of OpenFoam uses a local time step for their new VOF solver:
http://www.openfoam.com/version2.0.0/steady-vof.php You might want to have a look at that. |
|
July 6, 2011, 10:37 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Chennai
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 16 |
Dear all,
( Please check the previous posts in this thread to have an idea) I have slightly modified the inviscid solver rhoCentralFoam in order to improve the acceleration to steady state using local time step without touching any other part (e.g. reconstruct(). - flux calculations). And it seems working for my case. If anyone have a word/doubt in my modification please post it. //////////Local time step - false time step forAll (mesh.C(),i) { cell faces = mesh.cells()[i]; denom = 0.0; forAll (faces,j) { denom = denom + ( (U[i] & mesh.Sf()[j]) + c[i]*mesh.magSf()[j] ); } falseTime[i] = maxCo * mesh.V()[i] / denom; } //////// Conservation equations // --- Solve density rho = rho - falseTime*fvc::div(phi); // --- Solve momentum rhoU = rhoU - falseTime*fvc::div(phiUp); // --- Solve energy rhoE = rhoE - falseTime*fvc::div(phiEp); |
|
January 9, 2012, 14:49 |
|
#7 |
Member
Eric M. Tridas
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 15 |
Has anyone else done this? I'm really interested in speeding up my rhoCentralFoam simulations but am having some trouble implementing it. I'd really appreciate the help anyone else can give!
Thanks, -Eric |
|
March 25, 2012, 12:19 |
|
#8 |
Senior Member
Ehsan
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 112
Rep Power: 17 |
Dear all
I need a reference which describes by more details the new local-time stepping (LTS) approach applied in VOF in openfoam. Thanks |
|
October 7, 2012, 13:23 |
|
#9 | |
Senior Member
mahdi abdollahzadeh
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Covilha,Portugal
Posts: 153
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
Dear Friend There is one question: the falsetime that you are calculating is the local deltaT. so its changing from cell to cell. so its almost the same as the local euler or coeuler scheme in openfoam? secondly this scheme is not giving unsteady result. just the final result could be correct? How can u access the simulationtime? how you will control writting the variables according the controldict writecontrol ( considering that u have local time ) Best Mahdi |
||
September 27, 2015, 13:24 |
|
#10 |
New Member
Kadu
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: India
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 11 |
Dear friend,
Can you please provide the 'local time stepping' related theory. Because I am not getting that how the cells will have different time steps, since they would be interdependent? Thanks. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Time step size and max iterations per time step | pUl| | FLUENT | 31 | October 23, 2020 23:50 |
Transient simulation not converging | skabilan | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 14 | December 17, 2019 00:12 |
Forces in OF15 | richard | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 180 | July 9, 2018 11:54 |
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 18 | March 3, 2015 06:36 |
Convergence moving mesh | lr103476 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 30 | November 19, 2007 15:09 |