CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Non-dimensionalizing Navier Stokes

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree15Likes
  • 10 Post By VincentD
  • 1 Post By VincentD
  • 2 Post By asal
  • 2 Post By asal

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 21, 2011, 09:29
Default Non-dimensionalizing Navier Stokes
  #1
New Member
 
Vincent
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 15
VincentD is on a distinguished road
This post is in response to a message I recieved of someone that wanted to have a more detailed explanation on how to obtain the non-dimensional NS equations. Since others might be interested (and the fact that I like this tex compiler) I posted on this forum.

For starters we introduce the Navier Stokes equations and look at the x-direction component:
\rho \Big(\frac{\partial v_x}{\partial t} + v_x\frac{\partial v_x}{\partial x} + v_y\frac{\partial v_x}{\partial y} + v_z\frac{\partial v_x}{\partial z}\Big) = - \frac{\partial p}{\partial x} + \mu \Big(\frac{\partial^2 v_x}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2 v_x}{\partial y^2} + \frac{\partial^2 v_x}{\partial z^2}\Big)
We assume no additional body forces. The components of the velocity field v are denoted by subscripts (x,y,z). The pressure is given by p and \rho is the density.

First we divide by the density \rho in order to simplify the equation.
\frac{\partial v_x}{\partial t} + v_x\frac{\partial v_x}{\partial x} + v_y\frac{\partial v_x}{\partial y} + v_z\frac{\partial v_x}{\partial z} = - \frac{1}{\rho} \frac{\partial p}{\partial x} + \nu \Big(\frac{\partial^2 v_x}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2 v_x}{\partial y^2} + \frac{\partial^2 v_x}{\partial z^2}\Big)
The reader should check that indeed each terms has a dimension equal to \frac{m}{s^2}. Now in order to obtaint the non-dimensional equation we make the following substitutions.
v_x = v_x^* V

p = p^* {V^2 \rho}

t = t^* T

x = x^* H

y = y^* H

z = z^* H

Quantities with a superscript star are dimensionless quantities and the capital letters V and H have dimensions \frac{m}{s} and m respectively.
Please check that these substitutions are indeed valid. For instance the physical length is 4 m. We decide to take the length H equal to 1 m, giving a non-dimensionalised length of 4.

Using the above substitutions we end up with the following equation:
\frac{\partial v_x^* V}{\partial t^* T} + v_x^* V\frac{\partial v_x^* V}{\partial x^* H} + v_y^* V\frac{\partial v_x^* V}{\partial y^* H} + v_z^* V\frac{\partial v_x^* V}{\partial z^* H}= - \frac{1}{\rho} \frac{\partial p^* V^2 \rho}{\partial x^* H } + \nu \Big(\frac{\partial^2 v_x^* V}{\partial {x^*}^2 H^2} + \frac{\partial^2 v_x^* V}{\partial {y^*}^2 H} + \frac{\partial^2 v_x^* V}{\partial {z^*}^2 H^2}\Big)

We simplify this equation and use that T = H/V.

\frac{\partial v_x^*}{\partial t^*} + v_x^* \frac{\partial v_x^*}{\partial x^*} + v_y^* \frac{\partial v_x^*}{\partial y^*} + v_z^*\frac{\partial v_x^*}{\partial z^*}= - \frac{\partial p^*}{\partial x^*} + \nu \frac{1}{V H} \Big(\frac{\partial^2 v_x^*}{\partial {x^*}^2} + \frac{\partial^2 v_x^*}{\partial {y^*}^2} + \frac{\partial^2 v_x^*}{\partial {z^*}^2}\Big)

Here \frac{\nu}{V H} is our inverse reynolds number.

\frac{\partial v_x^*}{\partial t^*} + v_x^* \frac{\partial v_x^*}{\partial x^*} + v_y^* \frac{\partial v_x^*}{\partial y^*} + v_z^*\frac{\partial v_x^*}{\partial z^*}= - \frac{\partial p^*}{\partial x^*} + \frac{1}{Re} \Big(\frac{\partial^2 v_x^*}{\partial {x^*}^2} + \frac{\partial^2 v_x^*}{\partial {y^*}^2} + \frac{\partial^2 v_x^*}{\partial {z^*}^2}\Big)

Where Re is defined as \frac{V H}{\nu}. Now we have non-dimensionalised the NS equations. Please rememeber that if you solve this equation you will end up with the nondimensionalised quantities. In order to revert them to physical quantities you will need to use the equation we proposed above when we non-dimensionalised the quantities.

Good luck!

Regards,

Vincent
VincentD is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 21, 2011, 11:31
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Praveen. C
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 343
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 18
praveen is on a distinguished road
Hi Vincent, why dont you post this into the wiki.
praveen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 21, 2011, 22:08
Default the force term problem
  #3
New Member
 
wuzj
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 15
jessy is on a distinguished road
if there are force term in the NS equation, how to deal with it??

for example, when use the immersed boundary method to solve the flow past fixed circular, what should i do with the force term nondimension???
jessy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 22, 2011, 07:03
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Vincent
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 15
VincentD is on a distinguished road
In the case of an additional body force (like gravity) the equation changes to include an additional term.
\rho \Big(\frac{\partial v_x}{\partial t} + v_x\frac{\partial v_x}{\partial x} + v_y\frac{\partial v_x}{\partial y} + v_z\frac{\partial v_x}{\partial z}\Big) = - \frac{\partial p}{\partial x} + \mu \Big(\frac{\partial^2 v_x}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2 v_x}{\partial y^2} + \frac{\partial^2 v_x}{\partial z^2}\Big) + \rho g_x

Again dividing by \rho yields this term indeed as an acceleration \Big(\frac{m}{s^2}\Big).

If we then substitute in the following way:

g_x = g_x^* \frac{V^2}{H}

We end up with the following equation:

\frac{\partial v_x^*}{\partial t^*} + v_x^* \frac{\partial v_x^*}{\partial x^*} + v_y^* \frac{\partial v_x^*}{\partial y^*} + v_z^*\frac{\partial v_x^*}{\partial z^*}= - \frac{\partial p^*}{\partial x^*} + \frac{1}{Re} \Big(\frac{\partial^2 v_x^*}{\partial {x^*}^2} + \frac{\partial^2 v_x^*}{\partial {y^*}^2} + \frac{\partial^2 v_x^*}{\partial {z^*}^2}\Big) + g_x^*

So for instance if we want to simulate gravity where g_x = 9.8 \frac{m}{s^2}. Then we first determine g_x^* by multiplying by H and dividing by V^2.

For instance, let's say we took H = 0.4 m and V = 2 m/s, this gives that g_x^* is equal to 9.8*0.4/4 is 0.98.

Good luck!

Regards,

Vincent
VincentD is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 22, 2011, 07:40
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Vincent
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 15
VincentD is on a distinguished road
A simple immersed boundary method can be implemented in the following way. The philosophy behind the idea is that we will determine the fluid flow without the obstacle and the in a next step force the fluid flow to zero using a body force.

Introducing a phase indicator function \alpha that can either be one (solid-phase) or zero (fluid-phase). By multiplying our body force with this phase indicator function we only imply a force where our obstacle is.

However we can't use a simple constant for the forcing term g_x^* since we want this opposing force to set the velocity exactly to zero and not a positive or negative value.

So we need a parametrization for our body force. The forcing in a certain cell can be expressed in the following form:

f = \frac{\alpha_{i,j,k}}{\Delta t}({v_x^*}_{i,j,k}-{v_d^*}_{i,j,k})

Here \alpha_{i,j,k} is our phase indicator function as defined above. \Delta t is our numerical timestep {v_x^{*}}_{i,j,k} the velocity in a certain cell at the current timestep before forcing. Our desired velocity is {v_d^*}_{i,j,k} which is equal to zero in the case of a solid. Combining these elements gives that our full equation:

\frac{\partial v_x^*}{\partial t^*} + v_x^* \frac{\partial v_x^*}{\partial x^*} + v_y^* \frac{\partial v_x^*}{\partial y^*} + v_z^*\frac{\partial v_x^*}{\partial z^*}= - \frac{\partial p^*}{\partial x^*} + \frac{1}{Re} \Big(\frac{\partial^2 v_x^*}{\partial {x^*}^2} + \frac{\partial^2 v_x^*}{\partial {y^*}^2} + \frac{\partial^2 v_x^*}{\partial {z^*}^2}\Big) + \frac{\alpha_{i,j,k}}{\Delta t}({v_x^*}_{i,j,k}-{v_d^*}_{i,j,k})

Now we need to supply a geometry field (\alpha) and the desired velocity field (which for simple cases will be zero everywhere).

Good luck!

Regards,

Vincent
randolph likes this.
VincentD is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 3, 2012, 09:28
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Astio Lamar
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pipe
Posts: 186
Rep Power: 14
asal is on a distinguished road
Dimensionless Navior-Stoks in cylindrical coordinate :



non-dimensional parameters which we use here:



for r-component we have:



onya and masoud.k like this.

Last edited by asal; May 3, 2012 at 11:35.
asal is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 3, 2012, 11:39
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Astio Lamar
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pipe
Posts: 186
Rep Power: 14
asal is on a distinguished road
for theta-component, we have:



and finally for z-component, we have:

onya and masoud.k like this.
asal is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 24, 2013, 23:03
Default
  #8
Member
 
Osman
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 53
Rep Power: 14
o_mars_2010 is on a distinguished road
Hi VincentD, could you tell me how to choose V and H ???
o_mars_2010 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 25, 2013, 07:00
Default
  #9
New Member
 
teja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
spark999 is on a distinguished road
Hi,
I need to non dimensionalize energy equation of navier stokes.
Can you help me out
spark999 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 21, 2015, 13:39
Default Non-dimensionalization of NV equations in cylindrical coordinates
  #10
New Member
 
Ahmed Aql
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 11
engahmed9221 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by asal View Post
Dimensionless Navior-Stoks in cylindrical coordinate :



non-dimensional parameters which we use here:



for r-component we have:



Please, Thank you for the great explanation. I have a question, how didn't you non-dimensionalized theta?! and is it okay to express the azimuthal (tangential) velocity with the same reference parameter as the axial and radial velocities? thank you!
engahmed9221 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 21, 2015, 14:14
Default
  #11
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,882
Rep Power: 73
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
theta is not dimensionally homogeneous to a lenght that needs to be non-dimensionalized but it is an angle position (rad).
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 21, 2015, 18:08
Default
  #12
New Member
 
Ahmed Aql
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 11
engahmed9221 is on a distinguished road
Thank You! but what will be wrong with the below dimensionless parameters?
I considered theta as a reference variable to dimensionalize the tangential coordinate

I also expressed the tangential dimensionless velocity considering the angular velocity as a reference variable.


engahmed9221 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 21, 2015, 18:18
Default
  #13
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,882
Rep Power: 73
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by engahmed9221 View Post
Thank You! but what will be wrong with the below dimensionless parameters?
I considered theta as a reference variable to dimensionalize the tangential coordinate

I also expressed the tangential dimensionless velocity considering the angular velocity as a reference variable.



No, theta ranges from 0 to 2*pi is already a non-dimensional number, furthermore, the velocity reference is unique
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 21, 2015, 18:26
Default
  #14
New Member
 
Ahmed Aql
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 11
engahmed9221 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
No, theta ranges from 0 to 2*pi is already a non-dimensional number, furthermore, the velocity reference is unique
Thank you Prof.

I can see now how theta is already dimensionless. I am still a little bet confused about how the tangential velocity can be expressed in terms of a the unique reference velocity (Vr) which has [ L / T ] dimensions while omega r have a dimension [ T ^-1] ?

Thank you so much
engahmed9221 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 21, 2015, 18:33
Default
  #15
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,882
Rep Power: 73
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by engahmed9221 View Post
Thank you Prof.

I can see now how theta is already dimensionless. I am still a little bet confused about how the tangential velocity can be expressed in terms of a the unique reference velocity (Vr) which has [ L / T ] dimensions while omega r have a dimension [ T ^-1] ?

Thank you so much
but v_theta is dimensionally homogenous, remember that the velocity magnitude is omega*r
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 21, 2015, 18:40
Default
  #16
New Member
 
Ahmed Aql
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 11
engahmed9221 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
but v_theta is dimensionally homogenous, remember that the velocity magnitude is omega*r
I GOT IT FINALLY !! Thanks a lot.
engahmed9221 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 10, 2017, 05:55
Default Surface tension
  #17
New Member
 
Adarsh Choudhury
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
AdarshC is on a distinguished road
How to non dimensionalise if we have to include surface tension and obtain Capillary number in the final equation
AdarshC is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Filtered navier stokes equation..LES:: Palani Velladurai Main CFD Forum 7 September 6, 2013 03:51
Adding a term to Navier Stokes Equation ashtonJ CFX 3 January 15, 2011 07:32
Navier stokes compresible viscid flow fea, somebody can help? Jose Choy Main CFD Forum 3 October 24, 2003 03:28
Newbie:Viscoelasticity and Navier stokes equation Rajil Saraswat Main CFD Forum 2 June 9, 2003 08:21
help: I am trying to solve Navier Stokes compressible and viscid flow Jose Choy Main CFD Forum 2 May 18, 2000 06:45


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:32.