|
[Sponsors] |
January 28, 2010, 00:54 |
NACA 0012 Different Angles of Attack
|
#1 |
New Member
Arvind
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi All,
I want to perform flow simulations over NACA 0012 at different angles of attack. The method i followed is as below X component of velocity, u = V cos(alpha) Y component of velocity, v = V sin(alpha) where alpha is the desired Angle of Attack. I gave this conditions of velocities in the Inlet boundary condition which i have modelled as the left vertical plane . Is this method correct?????? |
|
January 28, 2010, 08:43 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Attesz
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Munich
Posts: 368
Rep Power: 17 |
Send a picture about your domain with the boundaries marked. What are the other boundary conditions "above" and "under" the airfoil?
|
|
January 28, 2010, 09:45 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Arvind
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Attila,
Here is the picture of my domain I have given the velocity condition for inlet and pressure for both outlet and opening. Inlet: u = V cos(alpha) v = V sin(alpha) w = 0 Outlet & opening: Static pressure: sea level |
|
January 28, 2010, 09:48 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Attesz
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Munich
Posts: 368
Rep Power: 17 |
I can't find the picture...
|
|
January 28, 2010, 09:52 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Arvind
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 17 |
Hey am very sorry it didnt attach it says it exceeds de memory.....am jus searching hw to reduce its size.......please don mind
|
|
January 28, 2010, 10:06 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Arvind
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 17 |
I hav attached a word file which contains de domain pis.....
|
|
January 28, 2010, 12:50 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Attesz
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Munich
Posts: 368
Rep Power: 17 |
your settings are not so correct, you have better to use boundary conditions like in attached img.set the round inlet with velocity components, and the outlet to opening with static pressure, or set your inlet and opening boundaries to one opening with velocity, so you don't have to modify the geometry.
good luck Attesz Last edited by Attesz; January 28, 2010 at 14:34. |
|
January 29, 2010, 00:55 |
|
#8 |
New Member
Arvind
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Attila,
Thnx a lot for ur help. I have never tried a boundary like u hav shown. I wil work on that and let u know if i find any difficulties. |
|
January 6, 2013, 17:27 |
|
#9 | |
New Member
Ali
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Turkey
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 13 |
Quote:
|
||
March 18, 2014, 02:14 |
Naca 0012 airfoil domine size in 3-D
|
#10 |
New Member
Nagari.Veeraprasad
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
I am doing project on naca 0012 airfoil. I am completing my model in 3-D but i have doubt is how to take domine sizes. please suggest me.
|
|
March 18, 2014, 17:43 |
|
#11 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
You should do a sensitivity analysis to find out how close your boundaries should be. Is this what you are asking?
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Strange lift coefficients for NACA 0012 | dss1092 | FLUENT | 2 | August 27, 2009 12:02 |
much smoother Cd and Cl vs. angles of attack compared to experimental results | violet | FLUENT | 0 | June 17, 2009 15:52 |
Flows at High Angles of Attack | Sarah C. | FLUENT | 2 | March 18, 2009 08:39 |
Airfoil simulation in High Angles of Attack | Yasser Nabavi | FLUENT | 0 | April 21, 2006 18:28 |
NACA 0012 simulation results | Luis | FLUENT | 3 | February 15, 2006 12:42 |