|
[Sponsors] |
December 19, 2024, 11:53 |
streched elements: sudden solver divergence?
|
#1 |
Member
Giovanni Bettega
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 12 |
Hello forum,
I did a run using a hydrid grid (prismatic layers at walls, and a fully tetrahedral mesh at the fluid domain interior). The mesh engine is custom. SU2 tells me, about mesh quality: +--------------------------------------------------------------+ | Mesh Quality Metric| Minimum| Maximum| +--------------------------------------------------------------+ | Orthogonality Angle (deg.)| 51.2934| 89.7623| | CV Face Area Aspect Ratio| 1.75245| 655.572| | CV Sub-Volume Ratio| 1.01781| 5.38083e+08| +--------------------------------------------------------------+ The last parameter has a very high maximum value: 5.3E8. The solver starts and exits with residual divergence after a few iterations. Question: supposing the volume mesh is well defined (no intersecting elements, ...), in your experience could these very streched elements lead to this divergence, in a few iterations? Thanks a lot Giovanni Last edited by gbettega; December 19, 2024 at 18:08. Reason: picture missing, typo |
|
Tags |
divergence, mesh quality criteria |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Divergence detected in AMG solver: temperature | mou | FLUENT | 3 | April 9, 2024 01:51 |
Population Balance Modeling (PBM) - Ansys Fluent | chittipo | FLUENT | 164 | November 18, 2023 12:54 |
Error: WorkBench Error: Could not handle event: SolutionStatusUpdate | Kieyo | Fluent Multiphase | 0 | November 10, 2022 00:58 |
Two Phase Flow In Vertical Pipe | stonepreston | FLUENT | 2 | October 31, 2017 09:35 |
Star cd es-ice solver error | ernarasimman | STAR-CD | 2 | September 12, 2014 01:01 |