|
[Sponsors] |
how can I obtaion the aerodynamic forces on any component (boundary) from the restar |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 24, 2024, 09:53 |
how can I obtaion the aerodynamic forces on any component (boundary) from the restar
|
#1 |
New Member
zhou
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 7 |
After completing the CFD computation, how can I retrieve the aerodynamic forces on any component (boundary) from the restart file? This question arises because the boundaries for the integrated forces in the history file are specified in MARKER_MONITORING, but I need to analyze the forces on other components.
|
|
May 24, 2024, 17:39 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
bigfoot
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 676
Rep Power: 21 |
Why don't you include all markers in MARKER_MONITORING? You get the aerodynamic coefficients of all individual markers.
You can also save your problem as a multiblock paraview file. Then you have the individual markers available and you can use paraview's surface integration. |
|
May 24, 2024, 20:47 |
|
#3 |
New Member
zhou
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 7 |
If I put all the markers into MARKER_MONITORING, I will only get the total aerodynamic force from the history, not the integrated force for each marker.
My goal is to obtain the aerodynamic forces for all markers from a single CFD calculation. |
|
May 25, 2024, 09:16 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
bigfoot
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 676
Rep Power: 21 |
Code:
MARKER_MONITORING= surface1, surface2 % Sum of the integrals over surface1 and surface2: CL, CD HISTORY_OUTPUT= AERO_COEFF Code:
MARKER_MONITORING= surface1, surface2 % Individual integrals over surface1 and surface2: CL(surface1), CL(surface2) HISTORY_OUTPUT= AERO_COEFF_SURF |
|
May 25, 2024, 10:56 |
|
#5 |
New Member
zhou
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 7 |
Thank you very much; this has solved a long-standing issue for me because I did not see AERO_COEFF_SURF in temp.cfg.
Additionally, I have another related question. May I ask it here in this thread? The question is: If MARKER_MONITORING = surface1, surface2 is given and the results need to be output to the Tecplot file (i.e., OUTPUT_FILES = (SURFACE_TECPLOT_ASCII)), I desire the Tecplot file to generate two zones. However, no matter how many surfaces are in MARKER_MONITORING, they all end up as a single zone in the Tecplot file. |
|
May 30, 2024, 16:41 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
bigfoot
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 676
Rep Power: 21 |
I do not use tecplot, so I do not know if we the write proper multizone information to tecplot.
|
|
Tags |
force integration,restart |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Artificial wall error in fluent | aiden_1995 | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 9, 2023 15:06 |
The CoP Does not exist: Validating Aerodynamic forces through a "line of action" | ds4719 | Main CFD Forum | 14 | February 18, 2022 19:05 |
Radiation in semi-transparent media with surface-to-surface model? | mpeppels | CFX | 11 | August 22, 2019 08:30 |
Centrifugal fan-reverse flow in outlet lesds to a mass in flow field | xiexing | CFX | 3 | March 29, 2017 11:00 |
domain imbalance for enrgy equation | happy | CFX | 14 | September 6, 2012 02:54 |