CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > Siemens > STAR-CCM+

K-Omega vs K-epsilon convergence issues

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Peresvet

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 21, 2021, 14:42
Default K-Omega vs K-epsilon convergence issues
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
Korimbo is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone,

I am dealing with an external flow problem - urban flow to be more exact. I ran a simulation using standard k-epsilon turbulence model and it converged very easily and I got very accurate results when compared to experimental data. When I tried to switch to k-omega SST, only thing i changed was that i used specific dissipation rate instead of turbulent dissipation rate for the inlet conditions (i created another field function for the specific dissipation rate which is calculated from the turbulent energy and turbulent dissipation rate that i used in the k-epsilon case). Everything else, including the mesh, was the same. I am using wall functions and y+>30 to resolve the boundary layer near the walls. The residuals actually go very low to about 1e-6 but then start oscillating and the solution clearly hasnt converged.

Does anyone have an idea why k-omega SST could be problematic in that case?
Korimbo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 23, 2021, 00:34
Unhappy
  #2
Member
 
Peresvet
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: USSR
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 5
Peresvet is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Korimbo View Post
Hello everyone,

I am dealing with an external flow problem - urban flow to be more exact. I ran a simulation using standard k-epsilon turbulence model and it converged very easily and I got very accurate results when compared to experimental data. When I tried to switch to k-omega SST, only thing i changed was that i used specific dissipation rate instead of turbulent dissipation rate for the inlet conditions (i created another field function for the specific dissipation rate which is calculated from the turbulent energy and turbulent dissipation rate that i used in the k-epsilon case). Everything else, including the mesh, was the same. I am using wall functions and y+>30 to resolve the boundary layer near the walls. The residuals actually go very low to about 1e-6 but then start oscillating and the solution clearly hasnt converged.

Does anyone have an idea why k-omega SST could be problematic in that case?
To compare these models, it is necessary to initially have a fine mesh and additionally change the default settings. I would recommend starting the calculation (k - e), and switching to omega-sst in the middle.
For me, all hydrodynamic calculations converge well if the mesh is the same and fine enough for the two models. The mesh for the standard (k - e) model will not work. For small boat sizes, I use about 30 million cells with a standard pool, no extra volume. The prismatic layer is not less than 10 layers, and the initial volume of the water cell near the vessel is less than 0.5 mm3.
No problem. Precision 99.9 between models. Physicality at altitude.
Such tasks for experienced users are at the level of Doctors of alcohol.
Korimbo likes this.

Last edited by Peresvet; March 23, 2021 at 01:49.
Peresvet is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
convergence, k-epsilon, k-omega sst model, urban airflow


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Linear decay - implementation and convergence issues Diro7 OpenFOAM Programming & Development 0 March 15, 2021 05:53
RSM low Re Stress - Omega convergence issues Jonathan FLUENT 1 April 20, 2016 06:33
Tutorial on Fluidized Bed has convergence issues luca.delbene STAR-CCM+ 0 December 2, 2014 07:05
Convergence issues for steady turbulent diffusion flame stuntmanmike CFX 5 November 7, 2014 18:37
Convergence Issues 2D Airfoil AeroEngiNerd STAR-CCM+ 1 February 28, 2012 10:34


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:40.