|
[Sponsors] |
May 22, 2007, 20:09 |
CCM + handles sliding vanes?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm currently facing a job in the sliding vane compressor industry. It could be it will be required some cfd on this and I'm wandering if ccm+ can hanlde such problems and if people who already had any experience in the sector could give me some advice.
Thanks, Vmax |
|
May 23, 2007, 04:39 |
Re: CCM + handles sliding vanes?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
||
May 23, 2007, 06:44 |
Re: CCM + handles sliding vanes?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If it's a rigid body motion using an arbitrary sliding interface (ASI), then yes starccm+ can handle it.
|
|
May 23, 2007, 07:58 |
Re: CCM + handles sliding vanes?
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thank you.
Vmax |
|
May 23, 2007, 19:08 |
Re: CCM + handles sliding vanes?
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It is more than rigid body motion and ccm+ is not able to do it.
The vanes are sliding into the rotor, so this requires some radial filling of vertices. |
|
May 24, 2007, 05:25 |
Re: CCM + handles sliding vanes?
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In this particular application it isn't actually of interest to simulate the vanes radial motion, what suffices is to be able to simulate the rotor with fixed-length paddles rotating eccentrically inside the stator, which brings me to the question: if I go this way, is it possible to do this in ccm, despite obvious interference between the rotating paddles and the stator casing?
Thank you for your answers. Vmax |
|
May 24, 2007, 06:07 |
Re: CCM + handles sliding vanes?
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Normal" sliding mesh is no problem with ccm+.
Where is your problem to simulate the sliding vane pump with star v3. It is not that difficult. I can sell you the mesh motion macro if you want it. It is parametric, so you can create nearly every rotor with yust changing some numbers. |
|
May 24, 2007, 06:52 |
Re: CCM + handles sliding vanes?
|
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ok, as far as I understand the problem Bankerotti pointed out was about a sliding mesh moving onto a rotating reference frame, and this is not possible with ccm, do you agree with him?
About the software: the company interested in this application already got a star ccm + license and will not go for a starCD one in this year, neither will I. About your work: I just took a look into your website and it looks very interesting. Basically I do quite the same job here in Italy, as a cfd consultant. Now I'm going to migrate from CFX to starCCM+, both for usability and for costs reasons, that's why I'm so interested in it. If you are interested in sharing some opinions I can write to your website address, but only if you are interested, I don't want to spam you with unwanted messages. Thanks, Vmax |
|
May 24, 2007, 09:25 |
Re: CCM + handles sliding vanes?
|
#9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
A sliding vane pump is not a turbomachine, so you can not use rotating frames of reference. You have to model the geometry change of the chambers and this is not possible with ccm+ because it is not pure sliding mesh.
|
|
May 24, 2007, 14:11 |
Re: CCM + handles sliding vanes?
|
#10 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Joern Beilke states "A sliding vane pump is not a turbomachine" that is absolutely right. Though the rotor has a certain rpm but the physics of the problem is that of a compression process, i.e. a changing volume, with one boundary moving at the corresponding speed (Omega X rotor radius). Excellent movie
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFX-Mesh, guide vanes (baffles) and problems. | R. Janny | CFX | 2 | October 1, 2012 05:57 |
Need Materials on IGV(Inlet Guide Vanes) | Farid | CFX | 1 | December 9, 2007 17:44 |
pressure measure in centrifugal pump vanes | Patricio Torrejon | FLUENT | 1 | December 16, 2005 18:10 |
NUMERICAL INSTABILITY OVER THE SWIRLING VANES | Dan | Main CFD Forum | 2 | February 9, 2005 09:12 |
NEED HELP! Flow through nozzle vanes with clerance | C K Tang | Fidelity CFD | 2 | July 29, 2003 14:07 |