|
[Sponsors] |
June 24, 2005, 22:19 |
Blasius-laminar flow comparison
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
has anyone tried to compare flat plate laminar solution of STAR with Blasius's formula? I seem to have a very good match for Rex = 1e5, but it deteriorate on either sides of this value... Any ideas as to why? |
|
June 28, 2005, 05:31 |
Re: Blasius-laminar flow comparison
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Blasius's formula is valid for low Re number and upto 1e5. if u have tried flat plate with very low Re then change er Turbulence model and also focus on near wall refinement.
|
|
June 28, 2005, 10:12 |
Re: Blasius-laminar flow comparison
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have tried it with Re number above AND below 1e5. The only value it works fine is at 1e5. Below this the skin friction given by star is below Blasius. I am running laminar case. The y+ values I calculated are below 1, so I assume the wall cells are refined enough.
|
|
June 29, 2005, 01:16 |
Re: Blasius-laminar flow comparison
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Anyway I had tried the laminar flow on an adiabatic flat pate characterized by a free stream Mach number M = 0.3 and by a Reynolds number based on the free stream condition and the plate length Re = 500. the leading edge starts at x = 0. The result was in good agreement.
Basically the exponent in Blasius's formula implies 1/7 power law velocity profile and hence modified for surface roughness. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
cfd and blasius | bigtuna | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 9, 2008 07:55 |
Macro and Micro pipe flow comparison | Dave | Main CFD Forum | 0 | December 13, 2007 15:04 |
turbulent & laminar result comparison | quarkz | Main CFD Forum | 1 | November 25, 2006 06:25 |
Comparison of 2 Phase Flow package | June Mo Koo | Main CFD Forum | 1 | July 25, 2001 22:52 |
CFD-Comparison, gas flow | Luciana Araujo | Main CFD Forum | 1 | August 4, 1999 12:32 |