CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > REEF3D

Decoupling factor for sediment transport calculation and time step for the flow

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Ronja

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 22, 2023, 11:28
Default Decoupling factor for sediment transport calculation and time step for the flow
  #1
New Member
 
NHAN
Join Date: Dec 2022
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 4
NTNHAN is on a distinguished road
Dear Professor Hans Bihs, Arun Kamath, Team REEF3D and all members,

I have a problem when I try to simulate the scour around piles following the paper: "Three-dimensional numerical modelling of wave-induced scour around piles in a side-by-side arrangement"
Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...78383917305604

The problem comes from section 3.4 Partial decoupling (page number 142 of the paper), I attached the figure below for convenience.

Hope to receive your help.

Thank you.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg discussion_reef3d.jpg (135.1 KB, 45 views)
NTNHAN is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 22, 2023, 11:34
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Hans Bihs
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Trondheim, Norway
Posts: 403
Rep Power: 19
valgrinda is on a distinguished road
Hi,

what is the problem excactly?
__________________
Hans Bihs
Team REEF3D
www.reef3d.com
valgrinda is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 22, 2023, 12:09
Default
  #3
New Member
 
NHAN
Join Date: Dec 2022
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 4
NTNHAN is on a distinguished road
Hello Professor

This is my problem:
1. I do not know how to define the values for the number of waves (N) and decoupling factor (DF) in your paper.

2. I want to define some parameters in REEF3D.
2.1 Number of waves (N) (I think: S 44 30, with N=30)
2.2 The morphological run for a duration of t=3600s (I think: S 19 3600)
2.3 The flow simulation time between the transport calculation is Δt/T=1/150 (I think: S 46 1/150 OR S 46 T/150 OR S 48 1/150).
2.4 Do we need to declare DF, Δt, Δts in REEF3D?

3. I attach control.txt and ctrl.txt files following parameters from your paper. Please help me check (if possible).

Please give me your recommendation.

Respect thank Professor.
Attached Files
File Type: txt control.txt (120 Bytes, 9 views)
File Type: txt ctrl.txt (841 Bytes, 12 views)
NTNHAN is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 27, 2023, 16:05
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Ronja
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 7
Ronja is on a distinguished road
Hi,


- The number of waves is basically defined via the stopping criteria time (how long you will run the simulation for), e.g. S19 for the morphological time or N 41 for the hydrodynamic time
-> let's say you choose S 19 3600 sec as your stopping criteria, then the morphological time is your scale


- flow simulation time between the transport calculation 'dt_hyd_sedcalc': S 42 3 (-> t/T) AND S 48 1/150 [for further context: you can also use other scales for this time span which would be S 42 1 (-> nr of iterations, e.g. S 44 10) OR S 42 2 (-> hydrodynamic time, e.g. S 46 0.02 sec)]



- DF is defined as the ratio between the morphological time step and the hydrodynamic time in between the sediment calculations. Hence, if DF = 2, the morphological time advances twice as fast as the hydrodynamic time.


- you can define the morphological time step 'dt_sed' with S 15 2 (fixed instead of adaptive) AND S 13 'your desired dt_sed according to your chosen DF'


Example:
T = 4.5sec -> flow simulation time between the sed transport calc dt_hyd_sedcalc= 4.5/150 = 0.03sec, usually 3600 sec are equal to 3600/4.5sec = 800 waves.

If you choose your morphological time step with a DF = 2: dt_sed = 2 x dt_hyd_sedcalc:
-> t_sed_total = 3600, defined by S 19
-> but t_hydr_total = 3600/2 = 1800 -> 400 waves
The higher the factor DF, the less waves are imposed since the total morphological time is the stopping criterion and it advances faster than the hydrodynamic time with a higher DF. As a logical step: also, the higher the decoupling, the faster your computational time will become.



An extended explanation, hope that helps.
NTNHAN likes this.
__________________
Ronja
Team REEF3D
www.reef3d.com
Ronja is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 28, 2023, 02:33
Default
  #5
New Member
 
NHAN
Join Date: Dec 2022
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 4
NTNHAN is on a distinguished road
Hello Ronja.

Thank you for your response.

Your answer is very clear.

One more issue is about Wave Generation and Beach parameter (B96).
For reduced-length NWT using the AWA method related to the above paper.
I guess B 96 0 0 (is it right?).
The Flow simulation time before sediment transport starts is t=25s, I guess S 45 25 (is it right?)

Best regards.

Last edited by NTNHAN; March 28, 2023 at 02:56. Reason: Addition more information
NTNHAN is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
high calculation time while obtaining RTD during two phase flow Abhinavmaurya Main CFD Forum 0 February 9, 2022 08:50
Slow calculation time on CFD server killian153 Hardware 4 July 27, 2021 08:28
AMI interDyMFoam for mixer nu problem danny123 OpenFOAM Programming & Development 8 September 6, 2013 03:34
number of iterations per time step chouki FLUENT 1 August 13, 2013 01:11
calculation diverge after continue to run zhajingjing OpenFOAM 0 April 28, 2010 05:35


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:35.