|
[Sponsors] |
Decoupling factor for sediment transport calculation and time step for the flow |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 22, 2023, 11:28 |
Decoupling factor for sediment transport calculation and time step for the flow
|
#1 |
New Member
NHAN
Join Date: Dec 2022
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 4 |
Dear Professor Hans Bihs, Arun Kamath, Team REEF3D and all members,
I have a problem when I try to simulate the scour around piles following the paper: "Three-dimensional numerical modelling of wave-induced scour around piles in a side-by-side arrangement" Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...78383917305604 The problem comes from section 3.4 Partial decoupling (page number 142 of the paper), I attached the figure below for convenience. Hope to receive your help. Thank you. |
|
March 22, 2023, 11:34 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Hans Bihs
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Trondheim, Norway
Posts: 403
Rep Power: 19 |
Hi,
what is the problem excactly? |
|
March 22, 2023, 12:09 |
|
#3 |
New Member
NHAN
Join Date: Dec 2022
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 4 |
Hello Professor
This is my problem: 1. I do not know how to define the values for the number of waves (N) and decoupling factor (DF) in your paper. 2. I want to define some parameters in REEF3D. 2.1 Number of waves (N) (I think: S 44 30, with N=30) 2.2 The morphological run for a duration of t=3600s (I think: S 19 3600) 2.3 The flow simulation time between the transport calculation is Δt/T=1/150 (I think: S 46 1/150 OR S 46 T/150 OR S 48 1/150). 2.4 Do we need to declare DF, Δt, Δts in REEF3D? 3. I attach control.txt and ctrl.txt files following parameters from your paper. Please help me check (if possible). Please give me your recommendation. Respect thank Professor. |
|
March 27, 2023, 16:05 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Ronja
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 7 |
Hi,
- The number of waves is basically defined via the stopping criteria time (how long you will run the simulation for), e.g. S19 for the morphological time or N 41 for the hydrodynamic time -> let's say you choose S 19 3600 sec as your stopping criteria, then the morphological time is your scale - flow simulation time between the transport calculation 'dt_hyd_sedcalc': S 42 3 (-> t/T) AND S 48 1/150 [for further context: you can also use other scales for this time span which would be S 42 1 (-> nr of iterations, e.g. S 44 10) OR S 42 2 (-> hydrodynamic time, e.g. S 46 0.02 sec)] - DF is defined as the ratio between the morphological time step and the hydrodynamic time in between the sediment calculations. Hence, if DF = 2, the morphological time advances twice as fast as the hydrodynamic time. - you can define the morphological time step 'dt_sed' with S 15 2 (fixed instead of adaptive) AND S 13 'your desired dt_sed according to your chosen DF' Example: T = 4.5sec -> flow simulation time between the sed transport calc dt_hyd_sedcalc= 4.5/150 = 0.03sec, usually 3600 sec are equal to 3600/4.5sec = 800 waves. If you choose your morphological time step with a DF = 2: dt_sed = 2 x dt_hyd_sedcalc: -> t_sed_total = 3600, defined by S 19 -> but t_hydr_total = 3600/2 = 1800 -> 400 waves The higher the factor DF, the less waves are imposed since the total morphological time is the stopping criterion and it advances faster than the hydrodynamic time with a higher DF. As a logical step: also, the higher the decoupling, the faster your computational time will become. An extended explanation, hope that helps. |
|
March 28, 2023, 02:33 |
|
#5 |
New Member
NHAN
Join Date: Dec 2022
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 4 |
Hello Ronja.
Thank you for your response. Your answer is very clear. One more issue is about Wave Generation and Beach parameter (B96). For reduced-length NWT using the AWA method related to the above paper. I guess B 96 0 0 (is it right?). The Flow simulation time before sediment transport starts is t=25s, I guess S 45 25 (is it right?) Best regards. Last edited by NTNHAN; March 28, 2023 at 02:56. Reason: Addition more information |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
high calculation time while obtaining RTD during two phase flow | Abhinavmaurya | Main CFD Forum | 0 | February 9, 2022 08:50 |
Slow calculation time on CFD server | killian153 | Hardware | 4 | July 27, 2021 08:28 |
AMI interDyMFoam for mixer nu problem | danny123 | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 8 | September 6, 2013 03:34 |
number of iterations per time step | chouki | FLUENT | 1 | August 13, 2013 01:11 |
calculation diverge after continue to run | zhajingjing | OpenFOAM | 0 | April 28, 2010 05:35 |