|
[Sponsors] |
April 2, 2009, 10:54 |
|
#21 |
Senior Member
Martin Beaudoin
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 332
Rep Power: 22 |
The problem is fixed.
Just update your svn working copy for Breeder_1.5, and recompile the library. Also make sure the environment variable FOAM_DEV is not defined when compiling the library for the OpenCFD version. Martin |
|
April 27, 2010, 01:07 |
|
#22 |
Senior Member
Jiang
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Japan
Posts: 186
Rep Power: 17 |
Dear all,
How can I create my own functionObject ? my purpose is to extract a plane data of internal domain in every time step, and save to disk. I noticed "surfaces functionObject" can do the similar thing, so I want to modify surfaces functionObject.I found it belongs to sampling, So I copy src/sampling directory to another position. I changed the name to LIB = $(FOAM_USER_LIBBIN)/libmysampling. in sampling\sampledSurface\sampledSurfaces, I found 2 places had name "surfaces", *.H file: public: //- Runtime type information TypeName("surfaces"); *.C文file: PtrList<sampledSurface> newList ( dict.lookup("surfaces"), sampledSurface::iNew(mesh_) ); I changed these "surfaces" to "mysurfaces", and compiled, no problem. but when I used, had the following mistake, Starting time loop --> FOAM Warning : From function dlLibraryTable:pen(const dictionary& dict, const word& libsEntry, const TablePtr tablePtr) in file lnInclude/dlLibraryTableTemplates.C at line 68 library "libmysampling.so" did not introduce any new entries Unknown function type mysurfaces Valid functions are : 5 ( surfaces fieldAverage fieldMinMax sets probes ) From function functionObject::New(const word& name, const Time&, const dictionary&) in file db/functionObjects/functionObject/functionObject.C at line 89. FOAM exiting It seems that my modified name haven't been registed in functionObject. Could anyone can give me some help ? Thanks. I am using like this in my controlDict file: extraction { type mysurfaces; functionObjectLibs ("libmysampling.so"); enabled true; outputControl timeStep; outputInterval 1; surfaceFormat foamFile; interpolationScheme cellPointFace; fields ( U T ); mysurfaces ( aplane { type plane; basePoint (-0.4 0 0.5); normalVector (1.0 0 0); } ); } |
|
October 4, 2010, 20:31 |
|
#23 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Posts: 42
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
Hi Bernhard, Is it possible to use panicDump to monitor and act on the mass flow through a patch? I would like my simulation to finish and end reasonably gracefully when the mass flow on a particular patch reaches a specified value. I am using the patchMassFlow function object to monitor the mass flow, which is great, but a mechanism for automatically stopping the run when the specified patchMassFlow value is reached would be even better. If this is possible, how do I go about setting it up? The code for panicDump is looking for a fieldName_ - Can I just insert the massFlow identifier here, or do I need to make some deeper modifications to the code? Also, what is the syntax fro the panicDump function? I have tried this: Code:
... ( exitStrategy { type panicDump; functionObjectLibs ( "libSimpleFunctionObjects.so" ); fieldName targetMassFlow; maximum 1.05; minimum 0; } Any assistance would be gratefully received... R |
||
October 5, 2010, 13:54 |
|
#24 | |
Assistant Moderator
Bernhard Gschaider
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,225
Rep Power: 51 |
Quote:
Bernhard |
||
October 6, 2010, 00:56 |
|
#25 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Posts: 42
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
I think that is probably beyond my level of programming, so i will look at another way of doing this. Cheers, R |
||
January 3, 2012, 12:08 |
|
#26 |
Member
Tibor Nyers
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 91
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi,
I actually managed to solve my problem just before posting a question. Someone may have a hard time on this one in the future so I post it anyway. It took me a while to guess the correct syntax to specify a region for simpleFunctionObjects. My solver was chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam with correct region naming (fluid and solid) and I needed the average temperature of the solid. The correct region specification can be found below. Code:
T_average { type volumeAverage; functionObjectLibs ( "libsimpleFunctionObjects.so" ); region "solid"; fields ( T ); factor 1.0; verbose true; } @controlDict: regions ( solid01 solid02 ); @logfile: Average of T : solid01 = 300 solid02 = 273 |
|
January 3, 2012, 13:04 |
|
#27 | ||
Assistant Moderator
Bernhard Gschaider
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,225
Rep Power: 51 |
Quote:
Quote:
One workaround would be to use the variable replacement of OF to safe typing (this only works if functions is a dictionary, not a list): Code:
T_average1 { type volumeAverage; functionObjectLibs ( "libsimpleFunctionObjects.so" ); region "solid01"; fields ( T ); factor 1.0; verbose true; } T_average2 { $T_average1; region "solid02"; } You can write a feature request about the region-list too, but I don't think it is very likely that I'll do it as a) it is quite time consuming b) has the possibility to introduce a number of weird bugs Bernhard |
|||
January 4, 2012, 05:16 |
|
#28 |
Member
Tibor Nyers
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 91
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Bernhard,
thank you for the detailed explanation. I have registered at sourceforge but somehow when I click the submit error button the page goes to a blank one and I get no confirmation about the successful report, and my report won't show up on the report page. It's maybe related to the fact that I cannot choose from a category under the Enter Report Details. It's required but no options show up, just the default (select). Maybe I have to make a bug report about the bug trucker as well?! |
|
January 4, 2012, 10:04 |
|
#29 | |
Assistant Moderator
Bernhard Gschaider
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,225
Rep Power: 51 |
Quote:
Seriously. I'm afraid there is not much I can do about this problem. The missing Category isn't the problem. Sounds more like a "didn't redirect the https to the right server in the server-farm"-problem at Sourceforge (possibly combined with a restrictive company firewall at your place) Could you try it again and see if it is reproducible? I know this is frustrating if you lost a quarter of an hour of work because you wrote a detailed bug-report. So just fill out the basics: Title and in the description a link to this conversation. You can always add a note later on if the server accepts the bug report If it doesn't work for you reproducible then I'll open the report and will add you (so that you get updates) |
||
January 5, 2012, 04:54 |
|
#30 |
Member
Tibor Nyers
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 91
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi,
really appreciate your efforts! My issue won't go away, really strange, indeed. Code:
report the region on which the actual calculation is evaluated In a multi region setting the log file doesn't contain the region name on which the calculation is evaluated. If multiple simpleFunctionObjects report the same sort of data it would be more convenient for pyFoamPlotWatcher with customRegexp to have the region name on the different lines. @controldict T_average { type volumeAverage; functionObjectLibs ( "libsimpleFunctionObjects.so" ); region "solid01"; fields ( T ); factor 1.0; verbose true; } @logfile the "desired" output Average of T : solid01 = 300 Thanks! |
|
January 5, 2012, 06:54 |
|
#31 | |
Assistant Moderator
Bernhard Gschaider
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,225
Rep Power: 51 |
Quote:
Will add the feature request to the local bug-database and get to it (probably the output will only occur for non-default regions. That way it won't break old customRegexp that I (and possibly other people) rely on) Last edited by gschaider; January 5, 2012 at 07:14. |
||
January 5, 2012, 19:00 |
|
#32 | |
Assistant Moderator
Bernhard Gschaider
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,225
Rep Power: 51 |
Quote:
I copy/pasted your information into the form and saw the behaviour you described (plain white window). Then I removed the additional information (desired input/output) from the form and it worked. Adding the information afterwards was not a problem. My guess is that some of the "weird" characters threw the application into an undefined state Bernhard |
||
January 6, 2012, 03:19 |
|
#33 |
Member
Tibor Nyers
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 91
Rep Power: 17 |
Thank you, have added myself to the issue!
|
|
January 9, 2012, 10:28 |
|
#34 |
Member
Tibor Nyers
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 91
Rep Power: 17 |
Bernhard,
thank you for your time and patience, I have updated swak and everything works. |
|
March 10, 2014, 06:53 |
|
#35 |
Senior Member
Sita Drost
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Arnhem, The Netherlands
Posts: 227
Rep Power: 18 |
Dear Bernhard,
Thanks, it looks like your simpleFunctionObjects are exactly what I need. However, when I follow the instructions for compilation (wmake libso), I get an error similar to the one Juho mentioned (May 27, 2008): make: *** No rule to make target `/home/ahm_ubuntu/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-1.6-ext/src/OpenFOAM/lnInclude/UPstream.H', needed by `trackDictionary/trackDictionaryFunctionObject.dep'. Stop. As you can see in the error message, I use OpenFOAM-1.6-ext. The simpleFunctionObjects I'm trying to compile are those intended for OpenFOAM-1.6. Does anyone know what I should do to fix this error? Thanks in advance! Sita |
|
March 10, 2014, 15:32 |
|
#36 | |
Assistant Moderator
Bernhard Gschaider
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,225
Rep Power: 51 |
Quote:
__________________
Note: I don't use "Friend"-feature on this forum out of principle. Ah. And by the way: I'm not on Facebook either. So don't be offended if I don't accept your invitation/friend request |
||
March 11, 2014, 04:18 |
|
#37 |
Senior Member
Sita Drost
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Arnhem, The Netherlands
Posts: 227
Rep Power: 18 |
Thanks, that seems to help, but now I get new errors... Allwclean doesn't work (Allwclean: command not found), but wclean simpleFunctionObjects does. Also rmdepall worked.
The errors I get now are: /home/ahm_ubuntu/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-1.6-ext/ThirdParty/packages/gcc-4.5.2/platforms/linux64GccDPOpt/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.2/include-fixed/features.h:338:25: fatal error: sys/cdefs.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. compilation terminated. make: *** [Make/linux64GccDPOpt/simpleFunctionObject.o] Error 1 make: *** [Make/linux64GccDPOpt/simpleDataFunctionObject.o] Error 1 make: *** [Make/linux64GccDPOpt/timelineFunctionObject.o] Error 1 Something wrong with my ThirdParty directory? Last edited by sita; March 11, 2014 at 04:20. Reason: typo |
|
March 11, 2014, 16:28 |
|
#38 | |
Assistant Moderator
Bernhard Gschaider
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,225
Rep Power: 51 |
Quote:
sys/cdefs.h: that is a problem of your installation and in no way related to SFO
__________________
Note: I don't use "Friend"-feature on this forum out of principle. Ah. And by the way: I'm not on Facebook either. So don't be offended if I don't accept your invitation/friend request |
||
March 12, 2014, 07:00 |
|
#39 |
Senior Member
Sita Drost
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Arnhem, The Netherlands
Posts: 227
Rep Power: 18 |
Hmm… I think I'll just upgrade to foam-extend-3.0 and try again. Thanks for your help!
|
|
June 6, 2014, 13:26 |
Which variables?
|
#40 |
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 13 |
I find this thread the best place to ask this question:
I am looking for a list of variables I can do field operations on, e. g. fieldAverage, fieldMinMax, etc. I found some information about the new features added for version 2.2, but I have no idea what possibilities are available. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Variable deltaT and functionObjects | henrik | OpenFOAM Bugs | 8 | July 22, 2009 05:11 |
OF15 functionObjects do not read LESProperties for incompressible flows | aunola | OpenFOAM Bugs | 1 | September 28, 2008 18:18 |
Collection Codes OpenFoam | larry | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | July 3, 2006 18:11 |
Collection efficiency | Jen | FLUENT | 0 | November 16, 2005 11:16 |
Data output collection | simon | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 29, 2003 10:03 |