|
[Sponsors] |
June 17, 2008, 18:00 |
Hi
I have been running a si
|
#1 |
New Member
samarth saurav
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: State college, PA, USA
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi
I have been running a simulation for an axisymmetric device with a sudden expansion. The working material is Nitrogen. I have run the simulation using fluent and openfoam. The results that I got from fluent are closer to experimental results that I got from a paper. The boundary conditions that I used in fluent are : 1)entrance : Constant inlet velocity of 1 m/s. 2)Wall: Adiabatic no slip 3)Exit: Constant pressure 1 atm (zero gauge) I am getting a difference in the solutions that I get from both softwares. The solutions are qualitatively similar. The difference lies in the reattachment lengths. Fluent gives me a reattachment length that is closer to the one mentioned in the paper. Am I making a mistake in the boundary conditions in openfoam. The bc's in openFOAM are as follows boundaryField { velocity-inlet-6 { type fixedValue; value uniform (1 0 0); } pressure-outlet-5 { type zeroGradient; } wall-4 { type fixedValue; value uniform (0 0 0); } } Thanks in advance for any help |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flow in a sudden pipe expansion | John Haynes | Main CFD Forum | 4 | December 1, 2008 10:23 |
Recirculation Length in Sudden expansion | Manu | CFX | 1 | June 12, 2006 07:46 |
Pressure loss due to sudden expansion in pipe flow | Ahmed | FLUENT | 0 | January 2, 2006 11:01 |
Sudden expansion problem | yongha | Siemens | 0 | August 16, 2002 08:10 |
heat transfer in sudden expansion flow | Adrian Yeap | Main CFD Forum | 1 | October 27, 1998 11:15 |