|
[Sponsors] |
September 5, 2011, 09:52 |
understanding the lien cubic low re model
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Roman Thiele
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eindhoven, NL
Posts: 374
Rep Power: 21 |
Hej,
can somebody maybe explain to me why the implementation of the lor reynolds number turbulence model by lien, chen and leschziner has such a complicated implementation of the non linear stress, one that does not seem to adhere to the paper (Lien et al., Low-Reynolds-number eddy-viscosity modelling based on non-linear stress-strain-vorticity relations, Proc. 3rd Symp. on Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Measurements, 1996, Crete, Greece) It seems that there are some simplifications steps taken, but I can't seem to understand those, because sometimes only one of the terms is missing like in the fifth term Code:
( C5viscosity_, dimensionedScalar("0", C5viscosity_.dimensions(), 0.0) )*gradU_ Code:
( C5viscosity_, dimensionedScalar("0", C5viscosity_.dimensions(), 0.0) )*(gradU_+gradU_.T() )
__________________
~roman |
|
March 3, 2012, 03:19 |
LienCubicLowRe bugs
|
#2 |
New Member
Saeed Salehi
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi Romant.
I've been working on LienCubicKELowRe lately. I think there is some bugs in it. Probably one of them is that you mentioned. another one is it the nonlinearstresses are not multiplied by fMu which is wrong. The epsilon equation is also seemed to be different from usual. Also i dont know about those coefficient if they are correct or not. because i dont have that paper you mentioned. i did A LOT of searches about it. but i couldn't find it. (do you have it?) |
|
March 3, 2012, 10:06 |
|
#3 | |
Senior Member
Roman Thiele
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eindhoven, NL
Posts: 374
Rep Power: 21 |
Quote:
so yeah, I have the paper, but I have it only in paper form. I will be able to have access again next week. There is also a second paper that is needed to full understand the paper by Lien, which is Craft, T.J., B.E. Launder, and K. Suga. “Development and Application of a Cubic Eddy-viscosity Model of Turbulence.” International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 17 (April 1996): 108–115 together with S. B. Pope, A more general effective-viscosity hypothesis, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 72 (1975), p. 331.
__________________
~roman |
||
March 3, 2012, 10:47 |
paper
|
#4 |
New Member
Saeed Salehi
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 16 |
thanks Romant. thanks alot!
unfortunately i dont have access even to this paper can you send me one of them? Email: Salehi144@gmail.com Last edited by salehi144; March 5, 2012 at 01:04. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Low Reynolds Number SST Model | Josh | CFX | 41 | June 4, 2023 19:00 |
Use of k-epsilon and k-omega Models | Jade M | Main CFD Forum | 40 | January 27, 2023 07:18 |
Water subcooled boiling | Attesz | CFX | 7 | January 5, 2013 03:32 |
Understanding k-omega SST model source code | tmhonka | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 1 | September 8, 2009 07:33 |
Low Inlet Turb. Intensity - SST model not converge | Pete | CFX | 0 | November 12, 2005 01:26 |