|
[Sponsors] |
September 20, 2010, 11:50 |
Viscous terms in rhoCentralFoam
|
#1 | |
Member
Florian Ettner
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 17 |
Dear Foamers,
I have a few questions on the viscous terms in rhoCentralFoam. In the source code, the energy equation looks like this: Quote:
2. I think I understand the heat conduction in line 200. What kind of conduction of internal energy is in lines 198-199 ? 3. What is the use of the repeated use of fvm and fvc discretisation of the same expressions in lines 197-199? Why is it not applied to the heat conduction in line 200? I'd be glad if anybody could help me understanding this issue. It would be quite important to me, as I currently work on extending the solver to reactive flows. Thank you in advance! |
||
March 14, 2012, 05:47 |
|
#2 |
Member
Alexander
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 17 |
Good day to everyone!
I also use rhoCentralFoam and I am interesting in questions about viscous dissipation. And about your questions: 2. "I think I understand the heat conduction in line 200. What kind of conduction of internal energy is in lines 198-199 ?" I want to know answer too =) Probably, it is turbulent heat transfer. In new version of rhoCentralFoam it is written as Code:
- fvm::laplacian(turbulence->alphaEff(), e) + fvc::laplacian(turbulence->alpha(), e) Answer is simple: there is solving of "corrector" step, because "fvm" means that for this term the matrix is prepared and the system wil be solved ("m" for "matrix"). Term with "fvc" means that term will be calculated in explicit way (the right part of matrix equation; "c" for "calculate"). So, lines 197-200 is the corrector which include the influence of thermal conductivity part in energy equation. Why turbulence is there? I do not know. I hope, alpha is zero for laminar flow =) But the main question: is the dissipation correctly taken into account? Because in my laminar trans-sonic tests (with low Reynolds number about 100) heating due to dissipation is absent (although it should be meaningful) =( |
|
March 21, 2012, 04:05 |
|
#3 |
Member
Alexander
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 17 |
I've just found that Prandtl number in rhoCentralFoam is always 1 (independent of what you have set in constant/thermophysicalProperties).
See bug http://www.openfoam.org/mantisbt/view.php?id=475 |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Implicit treatment of advection terms and pressure correction | nikosb | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 17, 2010 17:07 |
Question in definition of terms in solve | titio | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | March 19, 2009 17:02 |
Limited Gradients for Viscous fluxes and Sources | andy | Main CFD Forum | 7 | June 16, 2006 12:38 |
Implicitisation of viscous terms | Michael Halls-Moore | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 3, 2006 08:52 |
K-Epsilon model? | Brindaban Ghosh | Main CFD Forum | 2 | June 24, 2000 05:22 |