|
[Sponsors] |
implement a higher order time scheme for all OpenFOAM solver? |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Marko Josic
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Hello OpenFOAM community,
do you know why in OpenFOAM are only first or second order time schemes? is it complicated to implement a 2nd or 3rd order TVD time integration method? The rhoCentralFoam and rhoCentralDyMFoam would gain big advantage in time dependent problems. some cfd-online user had developed a 3rd and 4th order Runge.Kutta scheme, years ago, but I don't understand why their contribution is not integrated in the official OpenFOAM repository. how much afford would it be programming a higher order TVD method in a general way that can be selected for every OpenFoam solver? best regards emjay |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
time scheme |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[General] Extracting ParaView Data into Python Arrays | Jeffzda | ParaView | 30 | November 6, 2023 22:00 |
AMI speed performance | danny123 | OpenFOAM | 21 | October 24, 2020 05:13 |
OpenFOAM v3.0+ ?? | SBusch | OpenFOAM | 22 | December 26, 2016 15:24 |
Error with higher order (2nd, GAMMA) upwind scheme | quarkz | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 24, 2012 04:02 |
IcoFoam parallel woes | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | July 22, 2007 03:58 |