|
[Sponsors] |
Orientation of faceZone, mass flow sign convention |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 28, 2016, 00:53 |
Orientation of faceZone, mass flow sign convention
|
#1 | |
New Member
Florian Nguyen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi,
I am going to ask a question which is going to seem very basic, but you will understand my doubt when I explain. I am modelling two tanks with 1.0 atm / 0.2 atm connected to each other by a reed valve. I want to measure the mass flow pouring from the high pressure tank to the low pressure tank. For this I use rhoCentralFoam (OF3.0+). I defined my mesh using blockMesh and SNM, and a faceZone that I use for mass flow estimation. The "faceSet" picture shows the aspect of the faceZone. I checked visually that this face does not have any defects, like unwanted faces. Here is how I defined this face. Quote:
HOWEVER... For some reason, when I gradually refine my mesh to check for mass flow convergence, the outputed mass flow's sign, especially the stationary value, is changing sign! It does not make sense to me, because I don't see any such "change" in the velocity and pressure fields. The "velocityAtFace" picture shows the global trend for the velocity field (face is coloured with pressure, arrows according to velocity). This trend is the same for any other refinement level. My face is defined with a normal (0 0 1). According to the initial pressure difference existing between the tanks, I am expecting a velocity in -Z direction, so a negative mass flow through my face? In that case, I would like to understand why I have positive mass flow values for lower refinement levels and negative values for higher refinement, even if the velocity field appears not to be altered. My case is available temporarily at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0k...ew?usp=sharing If you want to see for yourself, just change the refinement levels of regions from 5 to 2 or 0. Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks to you all, Florian Last edited by Awak; June 28, 2016 at 10:40. |
||
June 28, 2016, 10:40 |
EDIT: Found something rather strange
|
#2 |
New Member
Florian Nguyen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 11 |
EDIT:
I cut a 2D slice at the location of the faceSet used for mass flow calculation, and plotted the velocity glyph. The velocity field looks perfectly fine: Screenshot from 2016-06-28 22:04:34.jpg Looking from above to this slice, the velocity field looks like this: Screenshot from 2016-06-28 22:10:27.jpg Now here comes the funny stuff... I put "valueOutput true;" to export the mass flow field in a VTK file at was looks to be steady state judging from the velocity field, and here is what mass flow distribution looks like on my faceZone: Screenshot from 2016-06-28 22:14:13.jpg This is rather confusing... I checked my faceZone before running the solver, so I really don't see what I am doing wrong. Could I have your lights please? |
|
August 1, 2016, 22:28 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Florian Nguyen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 11 |
Solved by constraining the cells by means of an AMI... Hope this will be useful to some of you.
Florian |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mass flow discrepancy | BenMUC | CFX | 3 | May 2, 2014 04:29 |
Discrete Phase & Mass Flow Rate | MagnusZeus | FLUENT | 0 | December 2, 2011 18:57 |
Mass flow rate through each cell | Babakjingo | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 21, 2011 04:18 |
mass flow | Wenbin Song | FLUENT | 0 | September 27, 2005 14:00 |
Target mass flow rate | Saturn | FLUENT | 0 | December 10, 2004 05:18 |