|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Is there a gap for eddy viscosity distribution in the wake ? when i use structure c grids,there is.but my classimate using unstructured grids got a no-gap result,why?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
wake of C grids is singular line. Usually, we use wake line BC as averaged value of nearest grid points. ie. suppose wake line are j=1,jmax, q(1)=q(jmax)=0.5*(q(2)+q(jmax-1)) best regards kei-tee |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thank you very much. I just do as you said .but there is a gap in the wake ,I don't know whether it is right.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
What kind of Turbulence model do you use? Some model needs special treatment for wake BC.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
i use k-epsilon,k-omeg & other use spalart.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
S-A needs wall distance. In wake region, you should take the value as large value (ex. 1.0E6).
I don't know for k-eps & k-omega. As long as you impose averaged value on Q vector & eddy viscosity in wake region, there is not a gap, I think. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boussinesq eddy viscosity assumption | siw | Main CFD Forum | 2 | February 17, 2011 13:30 |
Eddy Viscosity Transport Model | Jade M | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 21, 2010 15:17 |
Link between eddy viscosity and subgrid-scale turbulent viscosity in LES | Marvin | Main CFD Forum | 6 | December 4, 2009 12:08 |
Question about eddy viscosity ratio limit | Piti | CFX | 2 | January 17, 2008 17:49 |
eddy viscosity | Mike | CFX | 1 | April 4, 2006 14:12 |