|
[Sponsors] |
October 30, 2006, 23:16 |
Did you try Harpoon?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, Iīm wondering how "magic" is harpoon, like they say. I couldnīt get my demo due to some errors, but I would like to know how is Harpoon. Do you have to do a lot of work like others meshers in order to get a structured grid?
Thanks! |
|
October 31, 2006, 00:35 |
Re: Did you try Harpoon?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You don't get a structured grid. What you get is an unstructured hexa dominant grid, either with hanging nodes or with tetra between small and large grid cells. Harpoon is not an easy way of getting a good mesh, it is a quick way of getting a big mesh, especially for nasty geometry. It really comes into its own if you have the computing power (and parallel licenses) to handle very large grids. The advantage is that you don't spend a lot of time on meshing, you basically capture the detail you need with a large unstructured hexa mesh, which Harpoon generates very quickly.
|
|
October 31, 2006, 08:42 |
Re: Did you try Harpoon?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
Someone posted his feedback after testing harpoon a while back on this forum. You can find it by doing a search on the main forum. |
|
November 27, 2006, 05:50 |
Re: Did you try Harpoon?
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
HArpoon is ok for getting big size and quick meshes for some slivered, angle skewed geometries. May be better for developing hex in effcient way.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problem with baffles from Harpoon in OpenFoam | OMN | OpenFOAM | 0 | June 9, 2010 09:59 |
Harpoon and OpenFoam - Mesh and simpleFoam | scott | OpenFOAM | 4 | September 4, 2009 08:48 |
[Commercial meshers] Harpoon to Foam | Manuel Garcia (Garcia) | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 58 | March 25, 2008 19:38 |
[Commercial meshers] Bug in Harpoon OpenFoam export function | philippose | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | June 28, 2007 08:36 |
HARPOON Evaluation | Tang | Main CFD Forum | 12 | April 27, 2006 15:18 |