|
[Sponsors] |
November 4, 2011, 06:47 |
|
#21 |
Member
john
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi Amir/Flanker,
I have question regarding usage of Brownian force in Turbulent flow. It was mentioned in the Fluent 6.3.26 manual (section 22.2.1) that "Brownian force is intended only for nonturbulent models". is it?? I have already tested Lagrangian model (Fluent in built) for very fine particles such as 1nm and 5 nm. No. of particles deposited is almost same in both cases. Could please give me some suggestion how i can improve my results. Thanks John |
|
November 4, 2011, 09:50 |
|
#22 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
About brownian motion in turbulent flow, I think manual statement makes sense because it can be ignored in comparison with turbulent dispersion mechanism but I didn't check that before. And about deposition issues; I saw number of papers in which this issue was reported and 2 UDFs were written for both brownian motion and deposition; it's stated that there is a problem in particle velocity interpolation near boundaries which affects deposition; but as a general recommendation, it's better to use eulerian model for such range of diameters to get rid of such problems. Bests,
__________________
Amir |
||
November 5, 2011, 05:39 |
|
#23 |
Member
john
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi Amir,
Thanks for your reply. Could you please name the papers who used UDF for Brownian motion in DPM model. As you suggested i am planning to go for Eulerian method. Thanks John |
|
November 5, 2011, 05:50 |
|
#24 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Effectiveness of Direct Lagrangian Tracking Models for Simulating Nanoparticle Deposition in the Upper Airways; P. Worth Longest and Jinxiang Xi, Aerosol Science and Technology, 41:380–397, 2007 This is the most famous paper of this group, you can also find other papers of these authors in this field. Bests,
__________________
Amir |
||
July 24, 2012, 04:18 |
|
#25 |
Senior Member
MAZI
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 103
Rep Power: 17 |
hi.
as you know, in DPM of Fluent, 0.3 *(K/epsilon) is used as eddy life time. is it possible to write a udf to use another formula for eddy life time instead of above equation? and if yes how? |
|
August 16, 2013, 03:09 |
UDS(nanofluid) problems
|
#26 |
New Member
Jack Chung
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi experts,
I would like to add the transport equation of source term(Temperature) into the UDS for fluent and how can I do ? My geometry is a 3D cubical and it's enclosure, the fluid is water+nanofluid(Al2O3). I want to observe the natural convection heat transfer phenomena of nanofluids likes Rayleigh and number Nusselt number. Do I need to supply more details ? please help me |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
particle tracking | Wenqing Zhang | CFX | 15 | August 3, 2013 07:02 |
massless particle tracking problem | Renold | FLUENT | 0 | January 26, 2011 15:23 |
Particle Tracking for ion | Jun | CFX | 2 | August 31, 2010 09:19 |
Number density tracking rather than particle tracking | Rebecca | Main CFD Forum | 2 | April 23, 2009 13:52 |
DPM UDF particle position using the macro P_POS(p)[i] | dm2747 | FLUENT | 0 | April 17, 2009 02:29 |