|
[Sponsors] |
May 12, 2003, 21:36 |
Unsteady DPM
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi CFD USERS
I have to run DPM model under unsteady state conditions. I need to determine the number of time steps that I should request. Currently, I set a time step size of 0.01s with 25 iterations per time steps, and I get very good convergence of the continuous flow field. Preliminary estimations lead to 250 time steps (path length 5m, particle velocity 2.0m/s, thereby a particle would cross the domain in 2.5s). Unfortunately, this number of iterations demands more than 33 hours. and I need to run more than eight times the DPM model. As a result, I wonder if my estimations are right, and if could be another way to run particle tacking without requesting iterations of the continuous phase. Thank you in advance Alex Munoz |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Itīs possible to use this in unsteady dpm tracking? | JSoares | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 3 | June 9, 2011 11:41 |
steady or unsteady DPM ??? | Marina | FLUENT | 5 | July 5, 2006 05:52 |
Unsteady DPM | Johnny | FLUENT | 1 | February 22, 2006 14:43 |
unsteady DPM | Thiyagarajan | FLUENT | 4 | August 23, 2005 15:06 |
steady or unsteady? (in dpm) | winnie | FLUENT | 1 | April 28, 2003 12:30 |