CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Tets vs Hexs

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 19, 2002, 05:10
Default Tets vs Hexs
  #1
Phil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Could someone please explain why hexahedral cells are preferable to tetrahedral cells, I have a complex geometry that I have not been able to mesh in anything other that tets, will this give some error in my results?
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 19, 2002, 14:15
Default Re: Tets vs Hexs
  #2
Erwin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You don't necessarily get wrong results, it's just more difficult to get good results with tets since you can never align a tetrahedral element with the flow. It also takes a whole lot more tet cells than hex cells. So you need to take some precautions: 1) Try to keep boundary layers hexahedral 2) Use second order discretization 3) Be extra anal about tet cell skewness
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 19, 2002, 14:26
Default Re: Tets vs Hexs
  #3
rslgp
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hi Phil, my experience is very bad with tets. Lot of numerical diffusion is expected even with second order discretisation. if you have good experimental data for analysis of results, you go ahead. good luck
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[TGrid] hybrid mesh-huge tets Lilly ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 3 March 14, 2011 05:33
Refining Mesh using Tets and Prisms Help Please CFX 11 March 31, 2006 13:39
Comparison of tets and hexs olaf CFX 6 December 18, 2003 17:18
tets vs. hex mesh Simon Main CFD Forum 6 October 6, 2003 08:24
LES, k-e and tets JJ Main CFD Forum 1 September 23, 2003 14:47


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:29.