mas flow rate or mass flow rate?

January 29, 2002, 08:56

Hallo,

during my current analysis I'm monitoring the mass flow rate through two surfaces. It is possible to evaluate the mass flow through the same surfaces by REPORT-FLUX.

Why are there differences in the values between the two "methods"? What is the correct one?

Giacomo

January 29, 2002, 13:05

The Flux report will be the most accurate one, since it contains values that are same as computed by the solver. Surface Integrals is more a postprocessing option that can contain small errors from interpolation of node values.

February 5, 2002, 05:41

Thank you very much Erwin

Giacomo

January 29, 2002, 08:56	mas flow rate or mass flow rate?	#1
Giacomo Guest Posts: n/a	Hallo, during my current analysis I'm monitoring the mass flow rate through two surfaces. It is possible to evaluate the mass flow through the same surfaces by REPORT-FLUX. Why are there differences in the values between the two "methods"? What is the correct one? Giacomo

January 29, 2002, 13:05	Re: mas flow rate or mass flow rate?	#2
Erwin Guest Posts: n/a	The Flux report will be the most accurate one, since it contains values that are same as computed by the solver. Surface Integrals is more a postprocessing option that can contain small errors from interpolation of node values.

February 5, 2002, 05:41	Re: mas flow rate or mass flow rate?	#3
Giacomo Guest Posts: n/a	Thank you very much Erwin Giacomo

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Particle Injection Mass Flow Rate and Position	leonozx	FLUENT	3	March 9, 2018 10:58
Mass flow rate at the outlet	tejasvikrishna	FLUENT	2	May 25, 2013 03:42
Mass flow rate	sepidecent	CFX	0	August 9, 2011 01:15
negative global mass flow rate	Gimli	FLUENT	0	April 21, 2006 08:17
mass flow rate error	Masood	FLUENT	0	May 22, 2005 01:32