|
[Sponsors] |
September 19, 2000, 15:56 |
Particle Fate
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear all.
I am simulating a system in which a liquid with diluted particles flows in normal direction to a sphere. I am interested in knowing how many particles are impacted in the sphere's surface. I've set up several simple cases, but no matter what I change ( density of the fluid or particle, velocity, gravity, etc ), fluent reports that no particles are impacted on the sphere. I think that for dense fluids that is correct because the fluid will deviate the particles when they approach the surface, but I've used air and the same happens. Any sugestions?, am I missing some physics? Thanks in advance |
|
September 19, 2000, 22:33 |
Re: Particle Fate
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Arturo Ortiz
As you may know, particle hits or does not hit the wall depending on the flow condition & particle properties. So, even though particle density is much higher than fluid density, particel MAY not reach the wall depending on the flow condition, because of the DRAG force of light gas. The most important properties whcih have significant effect on the particle behavior are particle density and diameter. So, for your simple test, set very high value for particle diameter & particle density, e.g., 1.e4 micro-meter and 1.e5 kg/m3 or higher. I am sure, you can see that 'particle hits the wall(sphere)'. Please remember that this input is physically unrealistic for most case. I would like to say that flow condition is more important for particle behavior. Sincerely, Jinwook |
|
September 20, 2000, 13:07 |
Re: Particle Fate
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks for your comments, I've tried what you suggested; I used steel spheres (density >2.5)of 1 mm on air, even using a flat surface as target, but still can't get the particles impacted on the solid. I've tried as boundary conditions for the particles: escape and/or trap. I've made some simulations on complicated geometries and I obtained the particles impacted but not in simple ones.
Still wonder why. |
|
September 21, 2000, 06:55 |
Re: Particle Fate
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Arturo Ortiz
O.K. I myself am wondering. But, density = 2.5 ? Maybe it's specific gravity. Density is, I think, at least 7000 kg/m3. Sincerely, Jinwook |
|
September 29, 2000, 09:06 |
Re: Particle Fate
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In case of interacting phases (main phase and dispersed one) the resulting flow field is affected by the motion of both phases. However, the flow when facing an obstacle will deviate trying to avoid it. So do the particles. The solution is to turn on the stochastic model (I suppose your case is turbulent) and set the tries at a number >20 to get a statistically representative particle motion. In this case particles will follow "strange", zig-zag paths, due to the assumed turbulent fluctuations and a number of them will hit the solid. This number should stay approximately the same at each iteration for the particles. If not, increase the number of tries.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Blood Damage Modelling via Particle Tracking in a Centrifugal Heart Pump | scatman | CFX | 7 | January 8, 2018 01:59 |
Particle Transport Modelling - Fate Diagnostics | leeportnoff | CFX | 9 | January 12, 2012 10:48 |
Particle fate "Integration error" | ghorrocks | CFX | 5 | December 13, 2011 12:03 |
DPM UDF particle position using the macro P_POS(p)[i] | dm2747 | FLUENT | 0 | April 17, 2009 02:29 |
particle tracking collection tank | Neser | CFX | 1 | June 1, 2006 11:06 |