|
[Sponsors] |
About define different contact angles to each surface within one component |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 24, 2010, 11:36 |
About define different contact angles to each surface within one component
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 16 |
I wanna simulate a problem with GMO model. Fluid can wet one surface of the rigid moving body , the other faces can't be wetted. So, how to define the different contact angles to each surfaces within on component?
|
|
September 26, 2010, 17:04 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
michael barkhudarov
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sante Fe, New Mexico, USA
Posts: 337
Rep Power: 18 |
use two sub-components defining the GMO component. Each sub-component can have a unique contact angle. The input variable is CANGSUB(n) for a sub-component #n, I think.
|
|
September 28, 2010, 01:44 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 16 |
Thank u, MuxaB. But Flow3D have not afford the input variable CANGSUB for defining the contact angle for sub-component. There is only CANGLE for component in version 9.3.
I have thought using different components to define the rigid body. But i have no idea that how to make these components moving together. :-D |
|
September 28, 2010, 23:12 |
|
#4 | |
Senior Member
michael barkhudarov
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sante Fe, New Mexico, USA
Posts: 337
Rep Power: 18 |
Quote:
How come you use an older version? |
||
Tags |
gmo, surface tension |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[ICEM] surface mesh merging problem | everest | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 44 | April 14, 2016 07:41 |
Warning: surface area for component 1 is zero | luchezar | FLOW-3D | 1 | June 20, 2010 20:19 |
solid edge problem....can you help? | cindy | Main CFD Forum | 3 | April 5, 2004 14:43 |
reference on surface tension and the contact angle | Xicheng Jia | Main CFD Forum | 3 | August 25, 2003 15:57 |
CFX 4.4 New free surface option | Viatcheslav Anissimov | CFX | 0 | April 3, 2002 07:27 |